{"id":1029,"date":"2012-03-05T17:02:28","date_gmt":"2012-03-05T17:02:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.stockbrokerfraudblog.com\/2012\/03\/texas_securities_fraud_sipc_as"},"modified":"2022-04-20T13:39:12","modified_gmt":"2022-04-20T18:39:12","slug":"texas-securities-fraud-sipc-as","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/texas-securities-fraud-sipc-as\/","title":{"rendered":"Texas Financier Allen Stanford\u2019s Ponzi Scam: SIPC Asks District Court to Toss Out SEC Lawsuit Seeking to Reimburse Fraud Victims"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Securities Investor Protection Corp. is asking the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to reject the SEC&#8217;s request for an order that would make it pay back the victim of Texas financier R. Allen Stanford&#8217;s $7 Billion Ponzi scam. The brokerage industry-funded nonprofit claims that the Commission has not demonstrated that these investors are eligible to receive this type of coverage from SIPC.<\/p>\n<p>Standing by SIPC is the National Association of Independent Broker\/Dealers. The group wrote a letter to SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro contending that forcing the nonprofit to pay back Stanford&#8217;s victims is not only a &#8220;misfit solution,&#8221; but also, it will establish an &#8220;unsustainable precedent.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The SEC&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/texas.stockbroker-fraud.com\/\">securities lawsuit<\/a> against SIPC is an attempt to force a brokerage&#8217;s liquidation, which is the first step that SIPC must take under the Securities Investor Protection Act to pay back the clients of its member firms. SIPC, however, has refused to do so on the grounds that Stanford International Bank, which is based in Antigua, is not one if its member firms. Stanford International Bank is the financial firm that issued the more than $7.2 billion CDs that were sold to investors. (It is Stanford Group Co. that belongs to SIPC.) The CDs now have no value.<\/p>\n<div class=\"read_more_link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/texas-securities-fraud-sipc-as\/\"  title=\"Continue Reading Texas Financier Allen Stanford\u2019s Ponzi Scam: SIPC Asks District Court to Toss Out SEC Lawsuit Seeking to Reimburse Fraud Victims\" class=\"more-link\">Continue Reading \u203a<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Securities Investor Protection Corp. is asking the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to reject the SEC&#8217;s request for an order that would make it pay back the victim of Texas financier R. Allen Stanford&#8217;s $7 Billion Ponzi scam. The brokerage industry-funded nonprofit claims that the Commission has not demonstrated that these [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3752,3792,3888,3750],"tags":[2535],"class_list":["post-1029","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-financial-firms","category-ponzi-scams","category-stanford-group-co","category-texas-securities-fraud","tag-stanford-ponzi-scam"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Texas Financier Allen Stanford\u2019s Ponzi Scam: SIPC Asks District Court to Toss Out SEC Lawsuit Seeking to Reimburse Fraud Victims &#8212; Investor Lawyers Blog &#8212; March 5, 2012<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Securities Investor Protection Corp. is asking the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to reject the SEC&#039;s request for an order that &#8212; March 5, 2012\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/texas-securities-fraud-sipc-as\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Texas Financier Allen Stanford\u2019s Ponzi Scam: SIPC Asks District Court to Toss Out SEC Lawsuit Seeking to Reimburse Fraud Victims &#8212; Investor Lawyers Blog &#8212; March 5, 2012\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"The Securities Investor Protection Corp. is asking the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to reject the SEC&#039;s request for an order that &#8212; March 5, 2012\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Texas Financier Allen Stanford\u2019s Ponzi Scam: SIPC Asks District Court to Toss Out SEC Lawsuit Seeking to Reimburse Fraud Victims &#8212; Investor Lawyers Blog &#8212; March 5, 2012","description":"The Securities Investor Protection Corp. is asking the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to reject the SEC's request for an order that &#8212; March 5, 2012","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/texas-securities-fraud-sipc-as\/","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Texas Financier Allen Stanford\u2019s Ponzi Scam: SIPC Asks District Court to Toss Out SEC Lawsuit Seeking to Reimburse Fraud Victims &#8212; Investor Lawyers Blog &#8212; March 5, 2012","twitter_description":"The Securities Investor Protection Corp. is asking the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to reject the SEC's request for an order that &#8212; March 5, 2012","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/texas-securities-fraud-sipc-as\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/texas-securities-fraud-sipc-as\/"},"author":{"name":"Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e0240e0754684b69f7d6a7de1b9f1431"},"headline":"Texas Financier Allen Stanford\u2019s Ponzi Scam: SIPC Asks District Court to Toss Out SEC Lawsuit Seeking to Reimburse Fraud Victims","datePublished":"2012-03-05T17:02:28+00:00","dateModified":"2022-04-20T18:39:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/texas-securities-fraud-sipc-as\/"},"wordCount":540,"keywords":["Stanford Ponzi scam"],"articleSection":["Financial Firms","Ponzi Scams","Stanford Group Co.","Texas Securities Fraud"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/texas-securities-fraud-sipc-as\/","url":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/texas-securities-fraud-sipc-as\/","name":"Texas Financier Allen Stanford\u2019s Ponzi Scam: SIPC Asks District Court to Toss Out SEC Lawsuit Seeking to Reimburse Fraud Victims &#8212; Investor Lawyers Blog &#8212; March 5, 2012","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-03-05T17:02:28+00:00","dateModified":"2022-04-20T18:39:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e0240e0754684b69f7d6a7de1b9f1431"},"description":"The Securities Investor Protection Corp. is asking the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to reject the SEC's request for an order that &#8212; March 5, 2012","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/texas-securities-fraud-sipc-as\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/texas-securities-fraud-sipc-as\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/texas-securities-fraud-sipc-as\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Texas Financier Allen Stanford\u2019s Ponzi Scam: SIPC Asks District Court to Toss Out SEC Lawsuit Seeking to Reimburse Fraud Victims"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/","name":"Investor Lawyers Blog","description":"Published By Investment Fraud Attorneys \u2014 Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e0240e0754684b69f7d6a7de1b9f1431","name":"Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c7f8f04990816cd4044977eb59908da8c8d1ae487cc919cebd7027b74a0740a3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c7f8f04990816cd4044977eb59908da8c8d1ae487cc919cebd7027b74a0740a3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c7f8f04990816cd4044977eb59908da8c8d1ae487cc919cebd7027b74a0740a3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pedX9K-gB","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1029","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1029"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1029\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":26707,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1029\/revisions\/26707"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1029"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1029"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1029"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}