{"id":1645,"date":"2015-05-18T19:36:38","date_gmt":"2015-05-18T19:36:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.stockbrokerfraudblog.com\/2015\/05\/us_supreme_court_rules_on_401k"},"modified":"2015-05-18T19:36:38","modified_gmt":"2015-05-18T19:36:38","slug":"us-supreme-court-rules-on-401k","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/us-supreme-court-rules-on-401k\/","title":{"rendered":"U.S. Supreme Court Rules on 401K Lawsuit, Gives Investors More Protections"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\t\t\t\tThe nation&#8217;s highest court has just made it easier for workers to sue their 401k plans for charging excessive fees for investments. The case is<em> Tibble v. Edison International,<\/em> and the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously for the ex-workers of Edison International.<\/p>\n<p>The plaintiffs contended that the plan fiduciaries&#8217; decision to choose six retail-class mutual funds (out of the forty selected for the retirement plan) was based on the higher fees that these funds charged, compared to institutional class funds that were also allegedly available to investors. Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), retirement plans that are sponsored by an employer have a fiduciary obligation to choose investments that are appropriate and remove any that cease to meet the criteria set up in the investment policy statement. <\/p>\n<p>Five years ago, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California awarded the plaintiffs a $370,732 judgment over damages involving the high fees in three of the retail share class funds at issue. The claims against the other three funds are the ones that went to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and now the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<div class=\"read_more_link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/us-supreme-court-rules-on-401k\/\"  title=\"Continue Reading U.S. Supreme Court Rules on 401K Lawsuit, Gives Investors More Protections\" class=\"more-link\">Continue Reading \u203a<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The nation&#8217;s highest court has just made it easier for workers to sue their 401k plans for charging excessive fees for investments. The case is Tibble v. Edison International, and the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously for the ex-workers of Edison International. The plaintiffs contended that the plan fiduciaries&#8217; decision to choose six retail-class mutual [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3740],"tags":[2547,3514],"class_list":["post-1645","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-miscellaneous","tag-401k-lawsuits","tag-tibble-v-edison-international"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>U.S. Supreme Court Rules on 401K Lawsuit, Gives Investors More Protections &#8212; Investor Lawyers Blog &#8212; May 18, 2015<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The nation&#039;s highest court has just made it easier for workers to sue their 401k plans for charging excessive fees for investments. The case is Tibble v. &#8212; May 18, 2015\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/us-supreme-court-rules-on-401k\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"U.S. Supreme Court Rules on 401K Lawsuit, Gives Investors More Protections &#8212; Investor Lawyers Blog &#8212; May 18, 2015\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"The nation&#039;s highest court has just made it easier for workers to sue their 401k plans for charging excessive fees for investments. The case is Tibble v. &#8212; May 18, 2015\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"U.S. Supreme Court Rules on 401K Lawsuit, Gives Investors More Protections &#8212; Investor Lawyers Blog &#8212; May 18, 2015","description":"The nation's highest court has just made it easier for workers to sue their 401k plans for charging excessive fees for investments. The case is Tibble v. &#8212; May 18, 2015","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/us-supreme-court-rules-on-401k\/","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"U.S. Supreme Court Rules on 401K Lawsuit, Gives Investors More Protections &#8212; Investor Lawyers Blog &#8212; May 18, 2015","twitter_description":"The nation's highest court has just made it easier for workers to sue their 401k plans for charging excessive fees for investments. The case is Tibble v. &#8212; May 18, 2015","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/us-supreme-court-rules-on-401k\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/us-supreme-court-rules-on-401k\/"},"author":{"name":"Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e0240e0754684b69f7d6a7de1b9f1431"},"headline":"U.S. Supreme Court Rules on 401K Lawsuit, Gives Investors More Protections","datePublished":"2015-05-18T19:36:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/us-supreme-court-rules-on-401k\/"},"wordCount":424,"keywords":["401K Lawsuits","Tibble V. Edison International"],"articleSection":["Miscellaneous"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/us-supreme-court-rules-on-401k\/","url":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/us-supreme-court-rules-on-401k\/","name":"U.S. Supreme Court Rules on 401K Lawsuit, Gives Investors More Protections &#8212; Investor Lawyers Blog &#8212; May 18, 2015","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2015-05-18T19:36:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e0240e0754684b69f7d6a7de1b9f1431"},"description":"The nation's highest court has just made it easier for workers to sue their 401k plans for charging excessive fees for investments. The case is Tibble v. &#8212; May 18, 2015","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/us-supreme-court-rules-on-401k\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/us-supreme-court-rules-on-401k\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/us-supreme-court-rules-on-401k\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"U.S. Supreme Court Rules on 401K Lawsuit, Gives Investors More Protections"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/","name":"Investor Lawyers Blog","description":"Published By Investment Fraud Attorneys \u2014 Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e0240e0754684b69f7d6a7de1b9f1431","name":"Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c7f8f04990816cd4044977eb59908da8c8d1ae487cc919cebd7027b74a0740a3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c7f8f04990816cd4044977eb59908da8c8d1ae487cc919cebd7027b74a0740a3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c7f8f04990816cd4044977eb59908da8c8d1ae487cc919cebd7027b74a0740a3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pedX9K-qx","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1645","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1645"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1645\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1645"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1645"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1645"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}