{"id":4399,"date":"2007-04-24T16:40:27","date_gmt":"2007-04-24T16:40:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.stockbrokerfraudblog.com\/2007\/04\/the_10_leading_sec_enforcement_1"},"modified":"2021-09-20T15:41:25","modified_gmt":"2021-09-20T20:41:25","slug":"the-10-leading-sec-enforcement-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/the-10-leading-sec-enforcement-1\/","title":{"rendered":"The 10 Leading SEC Enforcement Developments Of 2006 (Part II)"},"content":{"rendered":"

\t\t\t\t6. The Continuation of Market Timing Cases<\/strong><\/p>\n

Market timing cases involving the SEC affected both sides of the trading desks. Those in charge of approving or facilitating market timing trades and as persons directly involved in market timing trades were singled out by the SEC, and significant monetary penalties were sometimes involved. <\/p>\n

A. Bear, Stearns & Co, Inc. and Bear, Stearns, Securities Corp.<\/em><\/p>\n

Continue Reading \u203a<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

6. The Continuation of Market Timing Cases Market timing cases involving the SEC affected both sides of the trading desks. Those in charge of approving or facilitating market timing trades and as persons directly involved in market timing trades were singled out by the SEC, and significant monetary penalties were sometimes involved. A. Bear, Stearns […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3760],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4399","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sec-enforcement"],"yoast_head":"\nThe 10 Leading SEC Enforcement Developments Of 2006 (Part II) — Investor Lawyers Blog — April 24, 2007<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"6. The Continuation of Market Timing Cases Market timing cases involving the SEC affected both sides of the trading desks. Those in charge of approving or — April 24, 2007\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/the-10-leading-sec-enforcement-1\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"The 10 Leading SEC Enforcement Developments Of 2006 (Part II) — Investor Lawyers Blog — April 24, 2007\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"6. The Continuation of Market Timing Cases Market timing cases involving the SEC affected both sides of the trading desks. Those in charge of approving or — April 24, 2007\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The 10 Leading SEC Enforcement Developments Of 2006 (Part II) — Investor Lawyers Blog — April 24, 2007","description":"6. The Continuation of Market Timing Cases Market timing cases involving the SEC affected both sides of the trading desks. Those in charge of approving or — April 24, 2007","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/the-10-leading-sec-enforcement-1\/","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"The 10 Leading SEC Enforcement Developments Of 2006 (Part II) — Investor Lawyers Blog — April 24, 2007","twitter_description":"6. The Continuation of Market Timing Cases Market timing cases involving the SEC affected both sides of the trading desks. Those in charge of approving or — April 24, 2007","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/the-10-leading-sec-enforcement-1\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/the-10-leading-sec-enforcement-1\/"},"author":{"name":"Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e0240e0754684b69f7d6a7de1b9f1431"},"headline":"The 10 Leading SEC Enforcement Developments Of 2006 (Part II)","datePublished":"2007-04-24T16:40:27+00:00","dateModified":"2021-09-20T20:41:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/the-10-leading-sec-enforcement-1\/"},"wordCount":1204,"articleSection":["SEC Enforcement"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/the-10-leading-sec-enforcement-1\/","url":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/the-10-leading-sec-enforcement-1\/","name":"The 10 Leading SEC Enforcement Developments Of 2006 (Part II) — Investor Lawyers Blog — April 24, 2007","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-04-24T16:40:27+00:00","dateModified":"2021-09-20T20:41:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e0240e0754684b69f7d6a7de1b9f1431"},"description":"6. The Continuation of Market Timing Cases Market timing cases involving the SEC affected both sides of the trading desks. Those in charge of approving or — April 24, 2007","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/the-10-leading-sec-enforcement-1\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/the-10-leading-sec-enforcement-1\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/the-10-leading-sec-enforcement-1\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The 10 Leading SEC Enforcement Developments Of 2006 (Part II)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/","name":"Investor Lawyers Blog","description":"Published By Investment Fraud Attorneys \u2014 Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e0240e0754684b69f7d6a7de1b9f1431","name":"Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c7f8f04990816cd4044977eb59908da8c8d1ae487cc919cebd7027b74a0740a3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c7f8f04990816cd4044977eb59908da8c8d1ae487cc919cebd7027b74a0740a3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c7f8f04990816cd4044977eb59908da8c8d1ae487cc919cebd7027b74a0740a3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pedX9K-18X","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4399","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4399"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4399\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20181,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4399\/revisions\/20181"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4399"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4399"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4399"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}