{"id":5157,"date":"2011-03-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-03-22T05:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/institutionalinvestorsecuritiesblog.blawgcloud.com\/2011\/03\/277_million_verdict_against_ap"},"modified":"2022-04-04T13:27:10","modified_gmt":"2022-04-04T18:27:10","slug":"277-million-verdict-against-ap","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/277-million-verdict-against-ap\/","title":{"rendered":"$277 Million Verdict Against Apollo Group for Alleged Misstatements to Investors Upheld by US Supreme Court"},"content":{"rendered":"

The US Supreme Court is upholding a $277 million securities fraud<\/a> verdict against Apollo Group and two ex-Apollo executives over claims that they misled investors about a Department of Education review report dealing with student recruitment policies. Apollo is the University of Phoenix\u2019s parent company. By issuing its order to uphold the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit\u2019s decision, which reverses the district court\u2019s ruling to throw out the verdict, the justices denied the defendants’ petition for certiorari. The plaintiffs of this securities case are a class of investors that bought Apollo Group, Inc. common stock.<\/p>\n

In 2004, the Education Department gave Apollo a preliminary report noting that the University of Phoenix had violated department regulations. Although the market did not react significantly to the news, Apollo\u2019s stock dropped dramatically after two analyst reports downgraded the stock. Policemen’s Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago later submitted a securities class action case claiming that because misleading statements were made during the review, investors ended up sustaining losses when the analyst reports revealed the truth. A jury ruled in favor of the plaintiffs.<\/p>\n

The verdict provides damages of $5.55\/share for stock bought during the class period. Interest, which has been accruing since 2004, will be included, and may up the amount owed to plaintiffs to over $280 million.<\/p>\n

Our securities fraud attorneys <\/a>are here to fight for our institutional investor clients\u2019 financial recovery. Over the years, we have successfully helped thousands of investors recoup their losses.<\/p>\n

Apollo Group, Inc. v. Policemen\u2019s Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago<\/a>, SCOTUS Blog, March 7, 2011<\/p>\n

Related Web Resources:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Class Action Securities Fraud Lawsuit Accuses SEC of Gross Negligence Related to Bernard Madoff Ponzi Scam<\/a>, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, November 23, 2010<\/p>\n

Court Rejects Defendants\u2019 Challenge to Poptech LP\u2019s Lead Plaintiff Status in Class Securities Fraud Lawsuit<\/a>, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, November 10, 2010<\/p>\n

Continue Reading \u203a<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The US Supreme Court is upholding a $277 million securities fraud verdict against Apollo Group and two ex-Apollo executives over claims that they misled investors about a Department of Education review report dealing with student recruitment policies. Apollo is the University of Phoenix\u2019s parent company. By issuing its order to uphold the U.S. Court of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3804],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5157","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-class-action-lawsuits"],"yoast_head":"\n$277 Million Verdict Against Apollo Group Upheld by US Supreme Court<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The US Supreme Court is upholding a $277 million securities fraud verdict against Apollo Group and two ex-Apollo executives over claims that they misled — March 22, 2011\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/277-million-verdict-against-ap\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"$277 Million Verdict Against Apollo Group Upheld by US Supreme Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"The US Supreme Court is upholding a $277 million securities fraud verdict against Apollo Group and two ex-Apollo executives over claims that they misled — March 22, 2011\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"$277 Million Verdict Against Apollo Group Upheld by US Supreme Court","description":"The US Supreme Court is upholding a $277 million securities fraud verdict against Apollo Group and two ex-Apollo executives over claims that they misled — March 22, 2011","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/277-million-verdict-against-ap\/","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"$277 Million Verdict Against Apollo Group Upheld by US Supreme Court","twitter_description":"The US Supreme Court is upholding a $277 million securities fraud verdict against Apollo Group and two ex-Apollo executives over claims that they misled — March 22, 2011","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/277-million-verdict-against-ap\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/277-million-verdict-against-ap\/"},"author":{"name":"Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e0240e0754684b69f7d6a7de1b9f1431"},"headline":"$277 Million Verdict Against Apollo Group for Alleged Misstatements to Investors Upheld by US Supreme Court","datePublished":"2011-03-22T05:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2022-04-04T18:27:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/277-million-verdict-against-ap\/"},"wordCount":331,"articleSection":["Class Action Lawsuits"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/277-million-verdict-against-ap\/","url":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/277-million-verdict-against-ap\/","name":"$277 Million Verdict Against Apollo Group Upheld by US Supreme Court","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-03-22T05:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2022-04-04T18:27:10+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e0240e0754684b69f7d6a7de1b9f1431"},"description":"The US Supreme Court is upholding a $277 million securities fraud verdict against Apollo Group and two ex-Apollo executives over claims that they misled — March 22, 2011","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/277-million-verdict-against-ap\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/277-million-verdict-against-ap\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/277-million-verdict-against-ap\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"$277 Million Verdict Against Apollo Group for Alleged Misstatements to Investors Upheld by US Supreme Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/","name":"Investor Lawyers Blog","description":"Published By Investment Fraud Attorneys \u2014 Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e0240e0754684b69f7d6a7de1b9f1431","name":"Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c7f8f04990816cd4044977eb59908da8c8d1ae487cc919cebd7027b74a0740a3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c7f8f04990816cd4044977eb59908da8c8d1ae487cc919cebd7027b74a0740a3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c7f8f04990816cd4044977eb59908da8c8d1ae487cc919cebd7027b74a0740a3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pedX9K-1lb","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5157","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5157"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5157\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":26356,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5157\/revisions\/26356"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5157"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5157"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5157"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}