{"id":5221,"date":"2011-11-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-11-23T06:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/institutionalinvestorsecuritiesblog.blawgcloud.com\/2011\/11\/wells_investment_securities_ag"},"modified":"2022-05-04T13:34:44","modified_gmt":"2022-05-04T18:34:44","slug":"wells-investment-securities-ag","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wells-investment-securities-ag\/","title":{"rendered":"Wells Investment Securities Agrees to $300,000 Fine by FINRA for Alleged Use of Misleading Marketing Materials for REIT Offerings"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>To settle FINRA accusations that it used misleading marketing materials when selling Wells Timberland REIT, Inc., Wells Investment Securities, Inc. has agreed to pay a $300,000 fine, as well as to an entry of the findings. However, it is not denying or admitting to the securities charges.<\/p>\n<p>FINRA claims that as the wholesaler and dealer-manager of the non-traded Real Estate Investment Trust\u2019s public offering, Wells approved, reviewed, and distributed 116 sales and marketing materials that included statements that were misleading, exaggerated, or unwarranted.The SRO contends that not only did most of the REIT\u2019s sales literature and advertisements neglect to disclose the meaning of Wells Timberland&#8217;s non-REIT status, but also it implied that Wells Timberland qualified as an REIT during a time when it didn\u2019t. (Although its initial offering prospectus reported that it planned to qualify as an REIT for the tax year finishing up at the end of 2006, it did not qualify until the one ending on December 31, 2009.) Also, FINRA believes that Wells Timberland\u2019s communications about portfolio diversification, redemptions, and distributions included misleading statements and that the financial firm lacked supervisory procedures for making sure the proprietary data and sensitive customer information were properly protected with working encryption technology.<\/p>\n<p>While non-traded REITs are usually illiquid for approximately 8 years or longer, certain tax ramifications can be avoided if specific IRS requirements are met. FINRA says that the Wells ads failed to ensure that investors clearly understood that an investment that is not yet an REIT couldn\u2019t offer them those tax benefits.<\/p>\n<p>Last month, FINRA put out an alert notifying investors about the risks of public non-traded REITs. Non-exchange traded real estate investment trusts are not traded on a national securities exchange. Early redemption is usually limited and fees related to their sale can be high, which can erode one\u2019s overall return. Risks involved include:<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 No guarantee on distributions, which can exceed operating cash flow.<br \/>\n\u2022 REIT status and distributions that come with tax consequences<br \/>\n\u2022 Illiquidity and valuation complexities<br \/>\n\u2022 Early redemption that is limited and likely costly<br \/>\n\u2022 Fees that can grow<br \/>\n\u2022 Unspecified properties<br \/>\n\u2022 Limited diversification<br \/>\n\u2022 Real Estate risk<br \/>\n<strong><br \/>\nFINRA wants investors considering non-traded REITs to:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Watch out for sales literature or pitches giving you simple reasons for why you should invest.<br \/>\n\u2022 Find out how much the seller is getting in commissions and fees.<br \/>\n\u2022 Know how investing in this type of REIT will help you meet your goals.<br \/>\n\u2022 Carefully study the accompanying prospectus and its supplements.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.finra.org\/investors\/insights\/commercial-equity-reits-fine-print#:~:text=Investor%20Alert-,Public%20Non%2DTraded%20REITs%E2%80%94Perform%20a%20Careful%20Review%20Before%20Investing,%2Dtraded%20REIT%22%20for%20short.\">Public Non-Traded REITs\u2014Perform a Careful Review Before Investing<\/a>, FINRA<\/p>\n<p><strong>More Blog Posts:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/morgan-stanley-faces-1m-finra\/\">Morgan Stanley Faces $1M FINRA Fine for Excessive Markups and Markdowns on Corporate and Municipal Bond Transactions<\/a>, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, September 17, 2011<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/2011\/10\/citigroup_global_markets_inc_s\">Citigroup Global Markets Inc. Sues Two Saudi Investors in an Attempt to Block Their FINRA Arbitration Claim Over $383M in Losses<\/a>, Stockbroker Fraud, October 22, 2011<\/p>\n<p> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wells-investment-securities-ag\/#more-5221\" class=\"more-link\">Continue Reading \u203a<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>To settle FINRA accusations that it used misleading marketing materials when selling Wells Timberland REIT, Inc., Wells Investment Securities, Inc. has agreed to pay a $300,000 fine, as well as to an entry of the findings. However, it is not denying or admitting to the securities charges. FINRA claims that as the wholesaler and dealer-manager [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3739,3776,3759],"tags":[2515],"class_list":["post-5221","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-finra","category-finra-settlements","category-reits","tag-wells-investment-securities"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Wells Investment Securities Agrees to $300,000 Fine by FINRA for Alleged Use of Misleading Marketing Materials for REIT Offerings &#8212; Investor Lawyers Blog &#8212; November 23, 2011<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"To settle FINRA accusations that it used misleading marketing materials when selling Wells Timberland REIT, Inc., Wells Investment Securities, Inc. has &#8212; November 23, 2011\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wells-investment-securities-ag\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Wells Investment Securities Agrees to $300,000 Fine by FINRA for Alleged Use of Misleading Marketing Materials for REIT Offerings &#8212; Investor Lawyers Blog &#8212; November 23, 2011\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"To settle FINRA accusations that it used misleading marketing materials when selling Wells Timberland REIT, Inc., Wells Investment Securities, Inc. has &#8212; November 23, 2011\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Wells Investment Securities Agrees to $300,000 Fine by FINRA for Alleged Use of Misleading Marketing Materials for REIT Offerings &#8212; Investor Lawyers Blog &#8212; November 23, 2011","description":"To settle FINRA accusations that it used misleading marketing materials when selling Wells Timberland REIT, Inc., Wells Investment Securities, Inc. has &#8212; November 23, 2011","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wells-investment-securities-ag\/","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Wells Investment Securities Agrees to $300,000 Fine by FINRA for Alleged Use of Misleading Marketing Materials for REIT Offerings &#8212; Investor Lawyers Blog &#8212; November 23, 2011","twitter_description":"To settle FINRA accusations that it used misleading marketing materials when selling Wells Timberland REIT, Inc., Wells Investment Securities, Inc. has &#8212; November 23, 2011","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wells-investment-securities-ag\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wells-investment-securities-ag\/"},"author":{"name":"Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e0240e0754684b69f7d6a7de1b9f1431"},"headline":"Wells Investment Securities Agrees to $300,000 Fine by FINRA for Alleged Use of Misleading Marketing Materials for REIT Offerings","datePublished":"2011-11-23T06:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2022-05-04T18:34:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wells-investment-securities-ag\/"},"wordCount":520,"keywords":["Wells Investment Securities"],"articleSection":["FINRA","FINRA Settlements","REITs"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wells-investment-securities-ag\/","url":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wells-investment-securities-ag\/","name":"Wells Investment Securities Agrees to $300,000 Fine by FINRA for Alleged Use of Misleading Marketing Materials for REIT Offerings &#8212; Investor Lawyers Blog &#8212; November 23, 2011","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-11-23T06:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2022-05-04T18:34:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e0240e0754684b69f7d6a7de1b9f1431"},"description":"To settle FINRA accusations that it used misleading marketing materials when selling Wells Timberland REIT, Inc., Wells Investment Securities, Inc. has &#8212; November 23, 2011","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wells-investment-securities-ag\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wells-investment-securities-ag\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wells-investment-securities-ag\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Wells Investment Securities Agrees to $300,000 Fine by FINRA for Alleged Use of Misleading Marketing Materials for REIT Offerings"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/","name":"Investor Lawyers Blog","description":"Published By Investment Fraud Attorneys \u2014 Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e0240e0754684b69f7d6a7de1b9f1431","name":"Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c7f8f04990816cd4044977eb59908da8c8d1ae487cc919cebd7027b74a0740a3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c7f8f04990816cd4044977eb59908da8c8d1ae487cc919cebd7027b74a0740a3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c7f8f04990816cd4044977eb59908da8c8d1ae487cc919cebd7027b74a0740a3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pedX9K-1md","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5221","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5221"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5221\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27153,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5221\/revisions\/27153"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5221"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5221"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5221"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}