{"id":6198,"date":"2017-09-13T17:23:46","date_gmt":"2017-09-13T22:23:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.institutionalinvestorsecuritiesblog.com\/?p=1781"},"modified":"2022-03-22T14:34:26","modified_gmt":"2022-03-22T19:34:26","slug":"finra-hearing-panel-orders-c-l-king-associates-pay-750k-inadequate-aml-program","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/finra-hearing-panel-orders-c-l-king-associates-pay-750k-inadequate-aml-program\/","title":{"rendered":"FINRA Hearing Panel Orders C.L. King &#038; Associates to Pay $750K Over Inadequate AML Program"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\t\t\t\tA Financial Industry Regulatory Authority extended hearing panel has ordered brokerage firm C.L. King &amp; Associates, Inc. to pay a $750,000 for purportedly acting negligently by making material representations and omissions to issuers in connections with debt securities redemptions for a hedge fund customer. The panel said that the broker-dealer and Gregg Alan Miller, its Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer, did not put into place a reasonable AML program and failed to adequately react to red flags indicating that the liquidation of billions of penny stock shares involving two customers might be signs of suspect activity.  Miller has been suspended from fulfilling a principal role for half a year and he must pay a $20K fine.<\/p>\n<p>Per the hearing panel\u2019s ruling, the hedge fund\u2019s manager set up joint accounts at the firm. A number of terminally ill people were given joint tenancy with survivorship rights to the accounts and they were paid $10K, after which they gave up their ownership rights to the assets in the accounts.<\/p>\n<p>The accounts were used to buy corporate bonds at reduced rates that came with a survivor option. This feature made it possible for the manager, as the survivor of the joint account, to redeem investments from issuers through the brokerage firm for the full principal figure prior to maturity once the joint tenant had died.  The FINRA panel said that CL King had a duty to let issuers know when the redemption process was taking place that the joint tenants that were terminally ill and not beneficiaries of the investments.<\/p>\n<p> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/finra-hearing-panel-orders-c-l-king-associates-pay-750k-inadequate-aml-program\/#more-6198\" class=\"more-link\">Continue Reading \u203a<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority extended hearing panel has ordered brokerage firm C.L. King &amp; Associates, Inc. to pay a $750,000 for purportedly acting negligently by making material representations and omissions to issuers in connections with debt securities redemptions for a hedge fund customer. The panel said that the broker-dealer and Gregg Alan Miller, its [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3739],"tags":[2897],"class_list":["post-6198","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-finra","tag-cl-king-associates"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>FINRA Hearing Panel Orders C.L. King &amp; Associates to Pay $750K Over Inadequate AML Program &#8212; Investor Lawyers Blog &#8212; September 13, 2017<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority extended hearing panel has ordered brokerage firm C.L. King &amp; Associates, Inc. to pay a $750,000 for &#8212; September 13, 2017\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/finra-hearing-panel-orders-c-l-king-associates-pay-750k-inadequate-aml-program\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"FINRA Hearing Panel Orders C.L. King &amp; Associates to Pay $750K Over Inadequate AML Program &#8212; Investor Lawyers Blog &#8212; September 13, 2017\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority extended hearing panel has ordered brokerage firm C.L. King &amp; Associates, Inc. to pay a $750,000 for &#8212; September 13, 2017\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"FINRA Hearing Panel Orders C.L. King & Associates to Pay $750K Over Inadequate AML Program &#8212; Investor Lawyers Blog &#8212; September 13, 2017","description":"A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority extended hearing panel has ordered brokerage firm C.L. King &amp; Associates, Inc. to pay a $750,000 for &#8212; September 13, 2017","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/finra-hearing-panel-orders-c-l-king-associates-pay-750k-inadequate-aml-program\/","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"FINRA Hearing Panel Orders C.L. King & Associates to Pay $750K Over Inadequate AML Program &#8212; Investor Lawyers Blog &#8212; September 13, 2017","twitter_description":"A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority extended hearing panel has ordered brokerage firm C.L. King &amp; Associates, Inc. to pay a $750,000 for &#8212; September 13, 2017","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/finra-hearing-panel-orders-c-l-king-associates-pay-750k-inadequate-aml-program\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/finra-hearing-panel-orders-c-l-king-associates-pay-750k-inadequate-aml-program\/"},"author":{"name":"Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e0240e0754684b69f7d6a7de1b9f1431"},"headline":"FINRA Hearing Panel Orders C.L. King &#038; Associates to Pay $750K Over Inadequate AML Program","datePublished":"2017-09-13T22:23:46+00:00","dateModified":"2022-03-22T19:34:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/finra-hearing-panel-orders-c-l-king-associates-pay-750k-inadequate-aml-program\/"},"wordCount":395,"keywords":["CL King &amp; Associates"],"articleSection":["FINRA"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/finra-hearing-panel-orders-c-l-king-associates-pay-750k-inadequate-aml-program\/","url":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/finra-hearing-panel-orders-c-l-king-associates-pay-750k-inadequate-aml-program\/","name":"FINRA Hearing Panel Orders C.L. King & Associates to Pay $750K Over Inadequate AML Program &#8212; Investor Lawyers Blog &#8212; September 13, 2017","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-09-13T22:23:46+00:00","dateModified":"2022-03-22T19:34:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e0240e0754684b69f7d6a7de1b9f1431"},"description":"A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority extended hearing panel has ordered brokerage firm C.L. King &amp; Associates, Inc. to pay a $750,000 for &#8212; September 13, 2017","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/finra-hearing-panel-orders-c-l-king-associates-pay-750k-inadequate-aml-program\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/finra-hearing-panel-orders-c-l-king-associates-pay-750k-inadequate-aml-program\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/finra-hearing-panel-orders-c-l-king-associates-pay-750k-inadequate-aml-program\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"FINRA Hearing Panel Orders C.L. King &#038; Associates to Pay $750K Over Inadequate AML Program"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/","name":"Investor Lawyers Blog","description":"Published By Investment Fraud Attorneys \u2014 Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e0240e0754684b69f7d6a7de1b9f1431","name":"Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c7f8f04990816cd4044977eb59908da8c8d1ae487cc919cebd7027b74a0740a3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c7f8f04990816cd4044977eb59908da8c8d1ae487cc919cebd7027b74a0740a3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c7f8f04990816cd4044977eb59908da8c8d1ae487cc919cebd7027b74a0740a3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pedX9K-1BY","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6198","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6198"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6198\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25030,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6198\/revisions\/25030"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6198"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6198"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6198"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}