{"id":691,"date":"2010-05-12T12:51:09","date_gmt":"2010-05-12T12:51:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.stockbrokerfraudblog.com\/2010\/05\/supreme_court_nominee_elana_ka"},"modified":"2022-05-03T15:30:17","modified_gmt":"2022-05-03T20:30:17","slug":"supreme-court-nominee-elana-ka","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/supreme-court-nominee-elana-ka\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Nominee Elana Kagan Took Investors Side on Two Significant Securities Cases"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\t\t\t\tThe Wall Street Journal reports that as Solicitor General of the United States, US Supreme Court nominee Elana Kagan has sided with investor interests in two high profile lawsuits. In one <a href=\"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/\">securities fraud<\/a> complaint that looked at when shareholders can sue mutual\u2013fund mangers that had allegedly charged fees that were excessive, her office submitted a legal brief supporting investors. Kagan contended that a lower-court ruling make sure that there was enough of a check on potentially exorbitant fees. In another<a href=\"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/\"> securities case<\/a>, the Solicitor General&#8217;s office argued that Merck &amp; Co. Inc. shareholders did not wait too long to file lawsuits accusing the pharmaceutical company of misrepresenting the safety of VIoxx. This spring, the US Supreme Court unanimously agreed with Kagan&#8217;s position in both cases.  <\/p>\n<p>However, The solicitor general&#8217;s office is siding with the business side in another investor lawsuit that awaiting resolution by the Supreme Court. She is contending that foreign investors shouldn&#8217;t be able to file a US securities lawsuit against National Australia Bank Ltd, which is a foreign company.<\/p>\n<p>The Wall Street Journal says that by choosing Kagan as the latest Supreme Court nominee, the Obama administration is taking &#8220;a friendlier approach&#8221; when it comes to investor cases.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Related Web Resources: <\/strong><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052748703880304575236280410908638?mod=WSJ_business_whatsNews\">Kagan Sided With Investors in Two Notable Securities Cases<\/a>, The Wall Street Journal, May 10, 2010<br \/>\nDoes Elena Kagan Support Shareholder Rights?, The Big Money, May 11, 2010<br \/>\nA Climb Marked by Confidence and Canniness, NY TImes, May 10, 2010<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/osg\/\">Office of the Solicitor General<\/a><br \/>\n <a href=\"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/supreme-court-nominee-elana-ka\/#more-691\" class=\"more-link\">Continue Reading \u203a<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Wall Street Journal reports that as Solicitor General of the United States, US Supreme Court nominee Elana Kagan has sided with investor interests in two high profile lawsuits. In one securities fraud complaint that looked at when shareholders can sue mutual\u2013fund mangers that had allegedly charged fees that were excessive, her office submitted a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3740,3741],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-691","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-miscellaneous","category-securities-fraud"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Supreme Court Nominee Elana Kagan Took Investors Side on Two Significant Securities Cases &#8212; Investor Lawyers Blog &#8212; May 12, 2010<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Wall Street Journal reports that as Solicitor General of the United States, US Supreme Court nominee Elana Kagan has sided with investor interests in &#8212; May 12, 2010\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/supreme-court-nominee-elana-ka\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Supreme Court Nominee Elana Kagan Took Investors Side on Two Significant Securities Cases &#8212; Investor Lawyers Blog &#8212; May 12, 2010\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"The Wall Street Journal reports that as Solicitor General of the United States, US Supreme Court nominee Elana Kagan has sided with investor interests in &#8212; May 12, 2010\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court Nominee Elana Kagan Took Investors Side on Two Significant Securities Cases &#8212; Investor Lawyers Blog &#8212; May 12, 2010","description":"The Wall Street Journal reports that as Solicitor General of the United States, US Supreme Court nominee Elana Kagan has sided with investor interests in &#8212; May 12, 2010","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/supreme-court-nominee-elana-ka\/","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Supreme Court Nominee Elana Kagan Took Investors Side on Two Significant Securities Cases &#8212; Investor Lawyers Blog &#8212; May 12, 2010","twitter_description":"The Wall Street Journal reports that as Solicitor General of the United States, US Supreme Court nominee Elana Kagan has sided with investor interests in &#8212; May 12, 2010","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/supreme-court-nominee-elana-ka\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/supreme-court-nominee-elana-ka\/"},"author":{"name":"Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e0240e0754684b69f7d6a7de1b9f1431"},"headline":"Supreme Court Nominee Elana Kagan Took Investors Side on Two Significant Securities Cases","datePublished":"2010-05-12T12:51:09+00:00","dateModified":"2022-05-03T20:30:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/supreme-court-nominee-elana-ka\/"},"wordCount":304,"articleSection":["Miscellaneous","Securities Fraud"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/supreme-court-nominee-elana-ka\/","url":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/supreme-court-nominee-elana-ka\/","name":"Supreme Court Nominee Elana Kagan Took Investors Side on Two Significant Securities Cases &#8212; Investor Lawyers Blog &#8212; May 12, 2010","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-05-12T12:51:09+00:00","dateModified":"2022-05-03T20:30:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e0240e0754684b69f7d6a7de1b9f1431"},"description":"The Wall Street Journal reports that as Solicitor General of the United States, US Supreme Court nominee Elana Kagan has sided with investor interests in &#8212; May 12, 2010","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/supreme-court-nominee-elana-ka\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/supreme-court-nominee-elana-ka\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/supreme-court-nominee-elana-ka\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court Nominee Elana Kagan Took Investors Side on Two Significant Securities Cases"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/","name":"Investor Lawyers Blog","description":"Published By Investment Fraud Attorneys \u2014 Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e0240e0754684b69f7d6a7de1b9f1431","name":"Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c7f8f04990816cd4044977eb59908da8c8d1ae487cc919cebd7027b74a0740a3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c7f8f04990816cd4044977eb59908da8c8d1ae487cc919cebd7027b74a0740a3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c7f8f04990816cd4044977eb59908da8c8d1ae487cc919cebd7027b74a0740a3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Shepherd Smith Edwards &amp; Kantas, LLP"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pedX9K-b9","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/691","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=691"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/691\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27148,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/691\/revisions\/27148"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=691"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=691"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investorlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=691"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}