Close

Articles Posted in Arbitration

Updated:

Fired UBS Broker’s $2.4 Million NASD Arbitration Award is Upheld

A $2.4 million NASD Arbitration Award to a former UBS financial adviser, who was fired in 2003 by the company that preceded UBS PaineWebber Inc. is being upheld by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. The court said that it did not agree with UBS’s…

Updated:

Study Says Securities Arbitrators Often Expunge Investor Settlements from Brokers’ Records

A recent study conducted by the Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association indicates that securities arbitrators frequently agree to erase past settlements that were paid to investors from brokers’ records. Removing brokers’ settlement payments from their histories could cause future investors to not find out about the brokers’ past misconduct. The…

Updated:

FINRA Is Pressured to Cut Ties Between Public Arbitrators and the Industry

Industry arbitration critics want the Financial Industry Regulator Authority to forbid “public” arbitrators from having any connections to the industry. Although the majority of arbitration panels in the industry continue to be made up of one industry member and two “public” panelists, critics say that the public members are not…

Updated:

FSC Securities Unit of AIG – A ‘Cozy’ Place for Fraud?

FSC created “an extremely cozy environment for a man bent on defrauding his customers,” said three NASD Securities Arbitrators, “management ineptness was broad” and the firm ignored red flags that the broker had “selling away” issues (using one’s status at a firm to aid in the sale of investments not…

Updated:

Merrill Lynch Ordered to Pay $1.6M to Former Broker for Ethnic Bias – But Will This Survive Appeal?

A NASD arbitration panel ordered Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. to pay an Iranian former employee $1.6 million, for claims that his boss set him up to be fired after discovering his ethnicity. Merrill is currently defending a suit filed in court by another Iranian who has also accused the…

Updated:

California Can Not Require Higher Standards for NASD Arbitration

The California Supreme Court and a U.S. Court of Appeals have both determined that securities arbitration standards do not violate the California Constitution. The courts have instead decided that The Federal Arbitration Act preempts (is superior to) California’s ability to govern securities arbitration. Rapidly growing arbitration is forcing consumers to,…

Updated:

Disputes With Former Brokerage Firms and Brokers Must be Arbitrated

In two related decisions the a New York U.S. Bankruptcy Court determined that a failed broker-dealer must arbitrate (under the NASD Code of Arbitration) its differences with a former registered representative and the firm that hired him — even though the defunct firm is no longer is an NASD member…

Updated:

U.S. Senators Push For The End of Mandatory Arbitrations

U.S. Senator Robert Casey of Pennsylvania has joined the efforts of two other U.S. Senators, and others, to persuade the SEC to lift the requirement mandating arbitration when there is a security dispute. Senator Casey expressed his opinion earlier this week at the yearly public policy conference hosted by the…

Updated:

Securities and Exchange Commission Looks At Arbitration

The SEC is considering a new policy that could let companies resolve shareholder complaints via arbitration. If adopted, this policy could limit a shareholder’s ability to sue the company in court. A move toward arbitration could shift the balance of power between corporate managements and shareholders during a time when…

Updated:

Is the Arbitration System Stacked In Favor Of Brokerage Firms and Against Investors?

After the U.S. Supreme Court decided to let brokerage firms make customers sign arbitration agreements, a lot of people thought that this was a faster, less expensive alternative than letting investors take their claims to courts. Recently, however, what seemed like a good way to resolve disputes between brokers and…

Contact Us
Live Chat