Articles Posted in Auction-Rate Securities

New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo filed a securities fraud lawsuit today against UBS AG related to what he is alleging was the firm’s fraudulent promotion of auction-rate securities as safe investments. He is reportedly seeking to make UBS offer to purchase back at face value approximately $25 billion in ARS instruments held by UBS clients in New York and across the United States.

Sources report that UBS is not the only entity that Cuomo may file charges against in the wake of his office’s investigation of auction-rate securities debacle. Thousands of investors have complained that they were told that the securities were like cash and would yield a little higher than a money market account.

Cuomo’s probe has focused on whether UBS and other investment firms notified investors of the risks involved with investing in auction-rate securities. He began his investigation in April when he subpoenaed 18 institutions. Since then, Cuomo has sent subpoenas to 100 individuals and 30 entities, including JP Morgan Chase & Co, Citigroup Inc., Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., and Merrill Lynch and Co.

Timothy P. Flynn, an ex-UBS broker, has filed a whistle-blower complaint. Flynn alleges that UBS Financial Services forced him to resign as part of the firm’s retaliation because he cooperated with regulators. Flynn, who sold $30 million in auction-rate securities to the Massachusetts municipalities, testified earlier this year at the request of Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley. who was investigating the sale of auction-rate securities to Massachusetts municipalities.

Flynn told investigators that UBS had told its brokers that the auction-rate securities were safe alternatives to cash. Flynn claims that UBS shut him out of his office and work e-mail files soon after he gave testimony and he was told to resign or face termination.

In his lawsuit, Flynn alleges that UBS knew the market could be on the brink of collapse but kept telling brokers to inform customers that the securities were safe investments. He filed his whistle-blower complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration in New York. The former broker’s lawyer says his client filed the complaint to preserve his reputation and enforce his rights.

Commonwealth of Massachusetts Secretary William Galvin is suing UBS because it says the investment firm pushed auction-rate securities onto investors in an effort to minimize its own losses. In his complaint, the state’s head securities regulator cited fraud as grounds for the lawsuit.

Galvin cites several e-mails that indicate that UBS told its sales team to aggressively sell the notes to as many investors as possible after the firm realized that the $300 billion auction-rate securities market was in trouble and there were beginning to be more people selling than buying.

One e-mail, dated December 15, indicates that UBS’s wealth management unit held $33 billion of the auction-rate securities and that the firm had underwritten $43 billion of the market’s securities. Galvin says UBS engaged in a “comprehensive and deliberate” strategy to minimize their inventory.

The Boston Globe says it has reviewed documents that indicate that UBS Financial Services continued selling municipal bond investments without warning clients of the risks even though the firm already knew that trouble was brewing. Yet when the $330 billion auction-rate securities market shut down in February, UBS brokers expressed surprise at the collapse.

This lack of disclosure is in contrast to UBS’s dealings with some of its bigger clients. The investment bank reportedly advised them of the pending problems at least three months before all trading ended. All this indicates that there is a possibility that UBS played a bigger part in the auction-rate securities collapse than it has owned up to, and the Securities and Exchange Commission and New Hampshire and Massachusetts regulators are investigating this matter-in addition to trying to determine whether UBS did in fact mislead investors.

UBS has acknowledged that it did not give some investors enough warning, and it has refused to explain why it warned other clients about the auction-rate securities risks. If only one side of UBS did in fact know about the upcoming auction-rate securities crisis and did not warn the other side, securities attorneys say that the investment firm could be in legal hot water.

UBS Financial Services Inc. and UBS Securities LLC, both units of UBS AG, have agreed to pay 19 Massachusetts public agencies and local governments over $35 million for their losses in the auction-rate securities market. The sum represents the return of principal payments by the municipalities.

The settlement agreement follows a probe by the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office into accusations that the two UBS units misled the local entities by convincing them that the investments were low-risk enough that they were allowable for towns and cities under Massachusetts law.

According to a UBS spokesperson, the investment bank agrees that the auction-rate securities investments are not in fact permissible under this law. The spokesperson said that the repayment and agreement with the Massachusetts entities only apply because of this specific law.