Financial Advisers

Wall Street Wars: SEC Chairman’s “Payback” to Investment Advisors?

Published on: June 16, 2007 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Last year, money managers directed a billion in dollars of their clients’ funds in hidden commissions to Wall Street investment firms, says SEC Chairman Christopher Cox. These “soft”dollars” are purportedly for research and other services. Instead, the funds are made available to the money managers who often use these for “lavish trips, theater tickets, and fancy meals,” Cox added.

In these “soft dollar” transactions, clients of investment advisers pay an extra five cents or so per share which is credited to cover costs of research and other services of the firm handling the transaction. A nickel per share may seem small, but on tens of billions of total shares traded becomes a huge amount. Those paying these costs include investors into mutual funds, pension funds, and 401(k) plans.

Laws impose a “fiduciary duty” on money managers to protect their clients’ interests, even over their own. Yet, a “safe harbor” was enacted in 1975 which allows the managers and brokerage firms to “bundle” research and other services with executions and not be liable for violating duties to their clients, including the duty to shop for the best execution price.

Janus Avoids Responsibility to Mutual Fund Shareholders for Alleged Role in Widespread Market Timing Scandal

Published on: June 11, 2007 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Shareholders of mutual funds Janus Capital Group may not pursue a class action claim that the company violated federal securities laws by permitting hedge funds to engage in market timing with the shares of mutual funds operated by Janus, the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland ruled.

In recent years, the U.S. Congress has been persuaded to limit class actions involving securities only to claims under federal securities laws. Meanwhile, federal securities claims are limited to misrepresentations and omissions in the purchase and sale of securities and do not, for example, include claims for actions which are simply fraudulent or negligent. Furthermore, courts have decided that no one can be held liable for assisting, or “aiding or abetting”, others in violating federal securities law. Such limitations enabled Janus avoid its responsibility and have the class action against it dismissed.

In their complaint, the plaintiffs, purchasers of Janus Group stock, alleged that the Janus Funds misstated in their fund prospectuses their policies regarding market timing and late trading.

According to Survey by Vestment Advisors Inc., Many Financial Advisers Knowingly Work Around Their Firms’ Compliance Rules

Published on: May 30, 2007 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

In a recent survey of financial services professionals, many financial advisers said that they knowingly skirted their companies’ compliance regulations and are tired of complying with a regulatory framework that seems to be growing more complicated.

100 financial services professionals were surveyed by Shorewood, Minnesota-based consulting and training firm for the financial services industry Vestment Advisors Inc. 71 of the respondents were registered representatives.

One survey participant said that everyone violates compliance rules on a daily basis because it was not possible to work in the securities industry without regularly violating an SEC or NASD rule Another participant said that it was unlikely that anyone had “never violated a compliance rule,” seeing that hundreds of rules existed.