SEC Enforcement

“America’s Prophet” Psychic Accused of Multimillion-Dollar Investment Fraud

Published on: March 10, 2010 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

According to the US Securities and Exchange Commission, Sean David Morton has bilked more than 100 investors of over six million dollars as the mastermind of an alleged offering fraud scheme. The man who calls himself “America’s Prophet” never professed to have a financial background. However, he is accused of promising prospective investors that he would use his psychic gifts to predict the movements of the stock market and advise his investing team.

The SEC claims Morton told investors he would use their funds to trade in foreign currencies and that profits would be distributed pro rata among them. The federal agency says that Morton, who describes himself as an intuitive consultant and trained Remote Viewer, lied to these investors about having a successful track record for being able to predict when the market will rise and crash. He also allegedly lied about how their money would be used, fund liquidity, and that profits were audited and certified.

Morton allegedly invested only half of the investors’ money in foreign currency trading firms. He is accused of diverting the rest, including at least $240,000 into his Prophecy Research Institute, a nonprofit religious group. Morton also allegedly commingled investors’ funds among the different entity accounts. The SEC contends that the defendant did not seek accreditation status from Delphi Investment Group investors.

Morton, Vajra Productions LLC, Magic Eight Ball Distributing, Inc., 27 Investments LLC, and Delphi Investment Group are the defendants in the SEC’s investment fraud lawsuit. Morton’s wife, Melissa, and Prophecy Research Institute are named relief defendants. The Mortons controls the entity defendants.

Federal regulators continue to warn investors that they must make sure that anyone they entrust with investing their funds is properly licensed. Unfortunately, many people are misled into investing in securities scams that end up costing them their hard-earned money and financial security.

Related Web Resources:
Investment ‘Psychic’ Accused of Financial Fraud, ABC News, March 8, 2010
Read the SEC Complaint, SEC.gov Continue Reading ›

Former Southwest Securities Broker’s Lifetime Industry Bar for Texas Securities Fraud is Affirmed, Says Appeals Court

Published on: January 26, 2010 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has affirmed the Securities and Exchange Commission’s lifetime bar against a former Southwest Securities Inc. stockbroker. Scott Gann, who allegedly committed Texas securities fraud, is no longer allowed to associate with dealers, investment advisers, and brokers.

The SEC imposed the permanent bar against Gann because of his alleged involvement in a mutual fund market timing scheme. The appeals court says that the SEC’s ruling is not an abuse of discretion and is supported by the record.

Gann and George Fasciano, also a former Southwest Securities broker, are accused of engaging in market timing trades for Haidar Capital Management and Capital Advisor. They allegedly got around the rules of some of the mutual funds that prohibit market timing by using multiple representatives and account numbers. Despite receiving 69 block notices from 34 mutual funds, their strategy allowed them to continue executing market timing trades.

The SEC filed an enforcement action in federal district court accusing the two men of violating the 1934 Securities Exchange Act Section 10(b). Fasciano settled before the case went to trial.

The district court held that Gann was in violation of Section 10(b). An SEC administrative law judge then entered a permanent associational bar against the ex-Southwest Securities broker. The SEC affirmed the bar, as did the appeals court.

The appeals court also noted that as Gann is convinced he did not engage in any wrongdoing even though the SEC and two courts found that Gann acted wrongfully-there is no guarantee he won’t commit future violations.

Related Web Resources:
Gann v. SEC, SEC.gov (PDF)

1934 Securities Exchange Act, Cornell University Law School Continue Reading ›

SEC Accuses Austin Advisor, Triton Financial, and Triton Insurance of Texas Securities Fraud Scam Involving Former NFL Football Players

Published on: December 28, 2009 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The Securities and Exchange Commission has filed charges accusing Austin investment adviser Kurt B. Barton and his two firms, Triton Insurance and Triton Financial, of committing Texas securities fraud and raising over $8.4 million from about 90 investors. Former football stars were used as bait to target former NFL players as potential investment fraud victim.

The SEC claims the defendants used salespersons, stockbrokers, and former football players, including previous Heisman trophy winners and ex-NFL players, to sell Triton securities to potential clients. The agency says that the use of ex-football stars allowed Barton and Triton to appear legitimate and gain investors’ trust.

Potential investors were allegedly told that their money would be used to buy an insurance firm. The SEC claims such representation were bogus. Instead, the agency claims that investors’ funds were used to pay for daily expenses at the two companies.

Texas Securities Fraud: SEC Freezes Assets of Fourth Person Involved in Alleged $485 Million Ponzi Scheme

Published on: December 23, 2009 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Earlier this month, the US Securities and Exchange Commission was able to get a temporary restraining order to the freeze the assets of Joseph Blimline, the fourth person accused of masterminding a $485 million Ponzi scheme involving Provident Royalties LLC. The SEC charged three other individuals, Brendan Coughlin, Paul Melbye, and Henry Harrison, in July. Their assets were also frozen.

In its amended complaint, the SEC alleged that Provident, owned by the four defendants, advanced approximately $93 million of investor funds to Blimline and entities that he controlled for the purchase of gas and oil interests. The fund repayments and the title, however, frequently did not go to Provident. The SEC also accuses Blimline of failing to disclose that he received the funds, was involved with Provident management, and had been sanctioned in the past by Michigan securities authorities.

The SEC’s amendment complaint charges the four men with violating the Securities Act of 1933 (Section 17a) and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The SEC is seeking preliminary and permanent injunctions, financial penalties, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, and prejudgment interest.

Director and officer bars are also being sought against the four defendants for allegedly committing Texas securities fraud. 36 affiliated entities are named as relief defendants for disgorgement purposes.

Texas Securities Commissioner Not Convinced SEC Has Reformed Itself Since Madoff Ponzi Scam

Published on: December 5, 2009 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Denise Voigt Crawford, the Texas securities commissioner and current North American Securities Administrators Association president, says it isn’t evident that the US Securities and Exchange Commission has implemented key reforms to the issues that allowed the agency to fail to detect Bernard Madoff’s $50 billion ponzi scheme for almost 20 years. Speaking at the National Press Club on Friday, she accused the SEC of not doing enough to support legislation intended to increase investor protection.

Crawford claims staffers that work for the SEC hardly interact with investment fraud victims. Because many SEC employees would like to work on Wall Street, she contends that this makes it difficult for agency members to properly oversee a securities firm that could potentially become a future employer.

Seeking to make a number of changes to the financial-overhaul bill currently moving through Congress, NASAA wants states securities regulators to have jurisdiction over securities firms that manage up to $100 million in assets. It also wants broker/dealers, and not just investment advisers, to be subject to a fiduciary standard when giving investment advice. NASAA wants to terminate mandatory pre-dispute arbitration clauses that make investors to pursue their securities fraud claims in arbitration proceedings run by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

Responding to Crawford’s comments, SEC spokesperson John Nestor called her statements “uninformed” and cited the agency’s proposal of the Investor Protection Act, its hiring of senior management, reforms made to internal operations, new rulemaking that is focused on investors, and an increase in investigations and penalties as among the numerous “dramatic” changes that the SEC has implemented since Madoff’s massive ponzi scam was discovered.

Related Web Resources:
State regulator: Jury still out on SEC post-Madoff, AP/Yahoo! News, December 4, 2009
2nd UPDATE:Texas Securities Regulator:’Jury Is Still Out’ On SEC Reform, Wall Street Journal, December 4, 2009
Texas State Securities Board

North American Securities Administrators Association
Continue Reading ›

SEC Submits Amended Complaint Against Bank of America Over Merrill Lynch Merger and Executive Bonuses

Published on: December 3, 2009 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The US Securities and Exchange Commission’s amended complaint regarding the acquisition of Merrill Lynch by Bank of America Corp. last January includes one new assertion. In addition to the SEC’s original allegations against Bank of America, the agency now says that the investment bank was in violation of proxy regulations when it did not provide a merger agreement schedule, as well as a list identifying what would have been included in the schedule.

At the center of the SEC lawsuit is Bank of America’s proxy disclosure to shareholders that it wouldn’t pay year-end bonuses to Merrill executives. Yet, even as Merrill posted a record $27.8 billion loss last year, its executives were paid $3.6 billion.

BofA and the SEC initially attempted to settle the allegations for $33 million. Federal Judge Rakoff, however, wouldn’t sign off on what he considered both a swift resolution to an embarrassing situation for the bank and an attempt to make it appear as if the SEC was engaged in enforcement.

Rakoff accused SEC of not being hard enough on Bank of America, which it is supposed to regulate, even as shareholders suffered. He also accused the defendant of neglecting to take responsibility for its actions, which forced taxpayers to bail out the investment bank. A trial is scheduled to begin on March 1.

The US Congress and New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo are also investigating the merger between Bank of America and Merrill Lynch.

Throughout the US, our securities fraud law firm represents investors who have suffered financial losses because of broker-dealer misconduct.

Related Web Resources:
SEC’s Amended BofA Complaint: New Claims, but No New Defendants, Law.com, October 23, 2009
Judge Rejects Settlement Over Merrill Bonuses, NY Times, September 15, 2009
SEC Fines Bank Of America $33 Million Over Bonuses, Consumer Affairs, August 3, 2009 Continue Reading ›

JP Morgan Chase to Pay $75 Million in Penalties and Forfeit $647 Million to Settle SEC Charges Over Alleged Municipal Bond Payment Scam

Published on: November 16, 2009 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

JP Morgan Chase has settled Securities and Exchange Commission charges that the securities firm was allegedly involved in an illegal payment scam to get municipal securities business from Jefferson County, Alabama. As part of its settlement with the SEC, JP Morgan Chase agreed to pay penalties of $75 million and forfeit $647 million in termination fees that it says the county owes. JP Morgan Securities will also pay Jefferson County $50 million, as well as a $25 million penalty. By agreeing to settle, the securities firm is not admitting to or denying the commission’s charges.

The SEC had accused JP Morgan Securities and former managing directors Douglas MacFaddin and Charles LeCroy of making over $8 million in undisclosed payments to friends of certain Jefferson County commissioners. These friends either worked for or owned broker-dealers in the area. The SEC says that these payments led to the commissioners voting for JP Morgan Securities as its managing underwriter of bond offerings. They also voted for JP Morgan Securities’s affiliated bank as the transactions’ swap provider.

The SEC claims JP Morgan Securities charged Jefferson County higher interest rates on swap transactions. This allowed it to pass on the unlawful payments’ costs. According to Robert Khuzami, SEC Enforcement Director, senior bankers with JP Morgan made illegal payments to earn fees and garner business.

The SEC has filed a civil lawsuit against LeCroy and Macfaddin. The SEC is accusing the two men of committing securities fraud for allegedly directing the illegal payments to the Jefferson County commissioners’ associates.

The commission claims the two men knew that the transactions, which occurred between October 2002 and November 2003, were “sham transactions.” The SEC says the men’s failure to disclose these payments or related “conflicts of interest” to either Jefferson County or bond offering investors or the county in the challenged swap agreements deprived those involved of swap agreement negotiations and bond underwriting processes that were impartial and objective. The SEC is seeking disgorgement plus prejudgment interest and permanent injunctions against the two men.

Related Web Resources:
JPMorgan to Pay $75 Million in Alabama Case, NY Times, November 4, 2009
Read the civil complaint (PDF)

Read the administrative complaint (PDF)
Continue Reading ›

SEC to Continue Fight Against Senior Investment Fraud in 2010

Published on: November 9, 2009 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The Securities and Exchange Commission is stepping up its efforts to combat senior investment fraud. In 2010, the SEC plans to focus on issues related to retirement investments, including product development, disclosures, and marketing issues.

The need to better regulate the retirement products arena and actively take action against securities fraud that targets elderly people has increased now that some 55 million senior investors are involved in defined contribution plans. The SEC is currently taking a closer look at life settlements (also called viatical settlements) and target date funds.

Viatical settlements involve transactions made by chronically ill or older people who sell their life insurance policy benefits to investors. In turn, these investors pay the premiums and collect the payout upon the seller’s death. According to the Senate Special Committee on Aging, the life settlement industry has doubled in value in the last 3 years and will likely exceed $150 billion in a few decades.

At this time, the SEC has limited authority over life settlement securities, which fall under its purview when they are solid in capital markets but also are sold in private offerings. On October 22, SEC Chairperson Mary Shapiro spoke at an American Association of Retired Persons forum. She called the life settlement market one of “emerging interest” and said its products could become Wall Street’s “next big securitized products.” The SEC has established a task force to determine whether this area of the market is regulated enough.

Shapiro expressed concern that many seniors may not comprehend the consequences of selling their life insurance policies to investors. She noted that tax benefits and the ability to get life insurance later on can be lost.

Shapiro says the commission is looking at target date funds and a target date’s use in the fund’s name. Target date funds are vehicles for college savings and retirement plans that move toward more conservative holdings as a specific date approaches. The SEC is taking a closer look at marketing and advertising collaterals to figure out if investors are getting accurate information about these products. Shapiro noted that some target-date funds lost up to 40% of their value when the economy collapsed last year.

Related Web Resources:
Schapiro: Settlements Need Watching

AARP

SEC
Continue Reading ›

SEC to Probe Whether Former Ferris, Baker Watts Inc. General Counsel Failed to Properly Supervise Broker Convicted of Securities Fraud

Published on: November 2, 2009 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The US Securities and Exchange Commission says it will investigate allegations that former Ferris, Baker Watts Inc. general counsel Theodore W. Urban did not properly supervise Stephen Glantz. In 2007, Glantz, who was employed by Ferris for almost thee years, pleaded guilty to lying to law enforcement officials and securities fraud.

The SEC says Urban ignored a number of warnings he received connecting Glantz to questionable activities and unauthorized trades. Urban also allegedly knew that numerous complaints had already been made against Glantz even before he came to work at Ferris. Not only did Glantz’s Form U-4 registration application show 10 customer complaints, but others had warned about his questionable reputation. Yet Urban still gave the broker more freedom than he did other brokers at the firm.

Urban is a former SEC staffer who was an Assistant Director in the Division of Market Regulation. In 2004, he recommended that Ferris, Baker Watts fire Glantz over unsuitable trades involving customer accounts. Urban later backed down from his stance. Instead, he and vice chairman Louis Akers were in agreement that Glantz be put under “special supervision.”

Glantz, another registered representative at another broker-dealer, and Glantz’ client David Dadante, were accused of manipulating the market for Innotrac Corp. Glantz also made unsuitable and unauthorized trades in a number of securities in his customers’ accounts.

Urban, according to his attorney, will contest the allegations.

Royal Bank of Canada subsidiary RBC Wealth Management acquired Ferris for $230 million in 2008.

While financial losses do occur when investing in the market, investor losses that are a result of broker fraud are unacceptable. You shouldn’t have to suffer because a broker or broker-dealer was negligent or engaged in misconduct.

Market Timing Violations Against AG Edwards & Sons Inc. Supervisors and Broker Upheld by the SEC

Published on: October 17, 2009 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The US Securities and Exchange Commission is upholding the market timing violations against two AG Edwards and Sons Inc. supervisors and one of its stockbrokers. Billions of dollars were involved in the mutual fund market timing transactions.

While market timing, which involves the buying and selling of mutual fund shares in a manner that takes advantage of price inefficiencies, is not illegal, a violation of 1934 Securities Exchange Act Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5. can arise when there is intent to deceive.

Last year, the ALJ found that AG Edwards and Sons brokers Charles Sacco and Thomas Bridge intentionally violated antifraud provisions when they engaged in market timing activities even though they had been restricted from doing so. The ALJ also found that supervisors Jeffrey Robles and James Edge failed to properly supervise the stockbrokers.

The antifraud charges filed against Bridge by the SEC Enforcement Division involved 1,352 trades (representing $1.126 billion) he executed over a two-year period for companies belonging to client Martin Oliner. The Enforcement Division accused Sacco of entering 25,533 market timing trades (representing $4.036 billion) for two hedge fund clients between 5/02 – 9/03.

The SEC determined that Edge, who was Bridge’s supervisor, knew and was complicit in the latter’s actions. Although Robles was not considered to have been complicit in Sacco’s alleged broker fraud, the commission said he should have noticed there were problems.

The SEC ordered Bridge to cease and desist from future violations. He is also barred from associating with any dealers or brokers for five years. Sacco has already settled his broker-fraud case.

Edge is barred from acting in a supervisory role over any dealer or broker for five years. Robles received a similar bar lasting three years. All three men were ordered to pay penalties, while Bridge was ordered to disgorge almost $39,000 plus $16,665.57 in prejudgment interest.

Related Web Resources:
Read the SEC’s Opinion regarding this matter

Commission Sanctions Thomas C. Bridge for Violations of the Antifraud Provisions of the Securities Laws and James D. Edge and Jeffrey K. Robles for Failing to Supervise Reasonably, Trading Markets, September 29, 2009 Continue Reading ›