Securities Fraud

Dismissal of Lone Star’s $60 Mortgage-Backed Securities Texas Fraud Action Against Barclays is Affirmed by Federal Appeals Court

Published on: January 17, 2010 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has affirmed the dismissal of LSF5 Bond Holdings LLC and Lone Star Fund V (U.S.) L.P.’s $60 million securities fraud claims against Barclays Capital Inc. and Barclays Bank PLC. The court noted that Barclays never represented that the mortgage pass-through certificates purchased by the private equity firms did not have delinquent mortgages. Also, the court said that seeing as the language used in the parties’ agreement obligated Barclays to substitute or repurchase delinquent representation, Lone Star failed to allege misrepresentation.

In 2006, Barclays bought mortgage loans from then-subprime lender New Century Capital Corp. Barclays then pooled about 10,000 mortgage loans into the BR3 and BR2 Trusts. The trusts then gave out pass-through certificates or mortgage-backed securities. $60 million of the securities were bought by LSF5.

Although trust offerings supplements and prospectuses included representations and warranties that as of “transfer service dating” the mortgage pools did not have any 30-day delinquencies, Lone Star found that nearly 300 of the BR2 mortgages were at least 30 days delinquent beginning the date of purchase. 850 mortgages in the BR3 Trust were also over 30 days overdue.

Lone Star filed a Texas securities fraud lawsuit against Barclays claiming that the delinquent loans were misrepresentations on the investment bank’s part. Barclays sought to have the lawsuit dismissed, arguing that if there were delinquent loans then Barclays must either substitute or repurchase them.

The district court turned down Lone Star’s remand request and agreed with Barclay’s interpretation of the language in the agreement. The court dismissed the case. The appeals court upheld the dismissal.

Related Web Resources:
Lone Star Fund V (U.S), LP et al v. Barclays Bank PLC et al, Justia Federal District Court Filings and Dockets
Read the 5th Circuit Opinion (PDF)
Continue Reading ›

For Role in $2.4 Billion Refco Investor Fraud Scheme, Former Mayer Brown Partner Receives 7-Year Prison Sentence

Published on: January 15, 2010 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Joseph P. Collins, a former Mayor Brown partner, has been sentenced to seven years in prison for his role in a $2.45 billion investment fraud scheme involving Refco Inc. He had hoped to obtain a more lenient sentence.

In July 2009, a jury found Collins guilty of wire fraud and securities fraud, as well as conspiracy to commit wire fraud, securities fraud, money laundering, bank fraud, and making false filings with the SEC. During his criminal trial, his defense attorneys argued that he did not know about the Refco fraud scam. However, while Southern Judge Patterson said that he believes Collins did not commit his crimes out of greed, Patterson noted what he called the firm partner’s “excessive loyalty” to his biggest client. According to Assistant U.S. Attorney Christopher J. Garcia, Collins brought in over $40 million to his law firm from his work with Refco.

Collins provided legal counsel and drafted documents that Refco principals used to conceal the company’s actual financial state while they made themselves wealthier. The government says that the documents were used to defraud Thomas H. Lee Partners, which owned a majority stake in Refco, and investors who purchased IPO shares in 2005.

Number of Ponzi Scam Collapses Increased Significantly Last Year

Published on: January 4, 2010 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The number of Ponzi scams that fell apart increased by nearly four times in 2009, compared to the year, before resulting in over $16.5 billion in investor losses. This figure comes from the Associated Press, which analyzed Ponzi schemes in all US states.

Additional findings from the AP analysis:

• Over 150 Ponzi schemes fell in 2009 • 40 scams collapsed in 2008 • Allen Stanford’s $7 billion international Ponzi scam and Scott Rothstein’s $1.2 billion scheme were among the larger plots that fell apart last year
Bernard Madoff’s $65 billion Ponzi scam wasn’t calculated into last year’s figures because he was arrested at the end of 2008.

In addition to increased enforcement efforts, the economic collapse can be credited with the discovery of many schemes that may have otherwise gone undetected. The number of people willing to invest in new ventures went down in 2009 while current investors rushed to pull out their money. As Ponzi scammers rely on new investors to not only pay the old investors but also fund their expensive lifestyles, many schemes collapsed. The discovery of Madoff’s Ponzi scam has also made investors more wary and regulators more alert.

Another scam of note is Tom Petters’ $3.65 billion scheme. Petters used Petters Group Worldwide, LLC to run his Ponzi scam. He is in prison waiting to receive his sentence. He could be sentenced to a life prison term.

In 2009, the Federal Bureau of Investigation opened over 2,100 securities fraud probes. That’s 350 more investment fraud investigations than the number of investment probes that were opened in 2008. The FBI had 651 agents working on high-yield investment fraud investigations last year. Also in 2009, the US Securities and Exchange Commission issued 82% more restraining orders against securities fraud cases than they did in 2008. Ponzi scams now compromise 21% of the SEC’s enforcement workload-up from 9% in 2005.

The number of civil actions (31) that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission filed last year has more than doubled since 2008. Many securities fraud cases from last year have not yet gone to trial.

Related Web Resources:
AP: Ponzi collapses nearly quadrupled in ’09, Yahoo, December 28, 2009
2009: The Year of the Ponzi, ABC News
Charles Ponzi
Continue Reading ›

SEC Accuses Austin Advisor, Triton Financial, and Triton Insurance of Texas Securities Fraud Scam Involving Former NFL Football Players

Published on: December 28, 2009 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The Securities and Exchange Commission has filed charges accusing Austin investment adviser Kurt B. Barton and his two firms, Triton Insurance and Triton Financial, of committing Texas securities fraud and raising over $8.4 million from about 90 investors. Former football stars were used as bait to target former NFL players as potential investment fraud victim.

The SEC claims the defendants used salespersons, stockbrokers, and former football players, including previous Heisman trophy winners and ex-NFL players, to sell Triton securities to potential clients. The agency says that the use of ex-football stars allowed Barton and Triton to appear legitimate and gain investors’ trust.

Potential investors were allegedly told that their money would be used to buy an insurance firm. The SEC claims such representation were bogus. Instead, the agency claims that investors’ funds were used to pay for daily expenses at the two companies.

Securities Fraud: Broker Sentenced for Selling High-Risk Short Term Funds to Four Pennsylvania School Districts

Published on: December 15, 2009 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The broker who pleaded guilty to one count of securities fraud for selling risky securities to four school districts in Pennsylvania has been sentenced to one year and a day in federal prison. Robert Bradbury, 63, must also pay a $10,000 fine.

The Pennsylvania school districts that were the victims of Bradbury’s investment fraud scam are Red Lion, North Penn, Boyertown, and Perkiomen Valley. The securities fraud scheme cost taxpayers over $10 million.

From 1998 to 2004, Bradbury illegally sold bond-anticipated notes for the Whitetail golf project. According to Eastern District of Pennsylvania’s U.S. Attorney Pat Meehan, the broker, who had worked with the school districts for three decades, took advantage of their trust when he underwrote and sold them the notes but failed to fully disclose the nature of the investments and the risks involved. While the four school districts are only allowed to make investments that fall under certain conservative categories.

Texas Securities Commissioner Not Convinced SEC Has Reformed Itself Since Madoff Ponzi Scam

Published on: December 5, 2009 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Denise Voigt Crawford, the Texas securities commissioner and current North American Securities Administrators Association president, says it isn’t evident that the US Securities and Exchange Commission has implemented key reforms to the issues that allowed the agency to fail to detect Bernard Madoff’s $50 billion ponzi scheme for almost 20 years. Speaking at the National Press Club on Friday, she accused the SEC of not doing enough to support legislation intended to increase investor protection.

Crawford claims staffers that work for the SEC hardly interact with investment fraud victims. Because many SEC employees would like to work on Wall Street, she contends that this makes it difficult for agency members to properly oversee a securities firm that could potentially become a future employer.

Seeking to make a number of changes to the financial-overhaul bill currently moving through Congress, NASAA wants states securities regulators to have jurisdiction over securities firms that manage up to $100 million in assets. It also wants broker/dealers, and not just investment advisers, to be subject to a fiduciary standard when giving investment advice. NASAA wants to terminate mandatory pre-dispute arbitration clauses that make investors to pursue their securities fraud claims in arbitration proceedings run by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

Responding to Crawford’s comments, SEC spokesperson John Nestor called her statements “uninformed” and cited the agency’s proposal of the Investor Protection Act, its hiring of senior management, reforms made to internal operations, new rulemaking that is focused on investors, and an increase in investigations and penalties as among the numerous “dramatic” changes that the SEC has implemented since Madoff’s massive ponzi scam was discovered.

Related Web Resources:
State regulator: Jury still out on SEC post-Madoff, AP/Yahoo! News, December 4, 2009
2nd UPDATE:Texas Securities Regulator:’Jury Is Still Out’ On SEC Reform, Wall Street Journal, December 4, 2009
Texas State Securities Board

North American Securities Administrators Association
Continue Reading ›

Number of Securities Lawsuits Increased During 3rd Quarter

Published on: November 20, 2009 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

According to commercial insurance consulting firm Advisen, 169 securities lawsuits were filed during 2009’s third quarter-an 11% increase from the 152 complaints that were filed during the previous quarter. 249 securities lawsuits were filed in the 1st quarter.

The most common kind of securities lawsuit filed this past quarter was securities fraud lawsuits that were brought by law enforcement agencies and regulators. 70 securities fraud complaints and 55 securities class actions were filed during 3Q. 50 securities fraud complaints and 38 cases were filed in the 2Q.

Advisen Executive Vice president Dave Bradford says the percentage of securities fraud lawsuits is expected to grow now that the Securities and Exchange Commission appears to be increasing its securities fraud enforcement initiatives under President Barack Obama. The SEC has been attempting to recoup from its failure to detect the $50 billion Ponzi scam that Bernard Madoff ran for years.

Obama Administration Supports Investors’ Securities Fraud Lawsuits Against Merck

Published on: November 18, 2009 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Taking the side of investors who are suing Merck for securities fraud, the Obama Administration filed an amicus brief last month arguing that the plaintiffs did not wait too long to file their complaints against the drug manufacturer. use. The painkiller drug was taken off the market in 2004. However, investors are accusing the company of misrepresenting how safe Vioxx was for use.

Investors are suing Merck for billions. They claim that they ended up paying inflated prices for Merck stock because the drug maker downplayed clinical trial test results that appeared to link Vioxx with a greater risk of heart attack. The investors filed one of several securities fraud lawsuits in 2003. At issue in the US Supreme Court case is whether investors should have realized sooner that fraud might have occurred.

Merck claims that investors should have filed their complaints earlier since by late 2001 there was already a lot of information out there alluding to possible misstatements by Merck about Vioxx. Merck has said it acted properly and in a timely manner when it did tell the scientific community and the US Food and Drug Administration about the Vioxx-related info.

The amicus brief, filed by U.S. Solicitor General Elena Kagan, is another indicator that the Obama administration may be more supportive than the Bush Administration of investor lawsuits. According to Shepherd Smith Edwards and Kantas Founder and Stockbroker Fraud Attorney William Shepherd, “It is an oddity to see our government take a legal position on behalf of investors! This may be the first time in a decade that I have seen an official legal position that is contrary to the vested position of Wall Street.”

Kagan says that the investment fraud lawsuits were filed in a timely manner because the plaintiffs did not know and could not have known about Merck’s alleged Securities Exchange Act Section 10(b) violations more than two year before they filed the complaints. She wants the Supreme Court to affirm the appeals court’s ruling that the shareholder complaint was timely. Per federal law, plaintiffs must file their securities fraud complaint within two years after finding out about the violation.

Related Web Resources:
Obama Sides With Investors in Merck Lawsuit, SmartMoney, October 26, 2009
U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Merck Appeal on Reinstated Investor Lawsuit, Insurance Journal, May 27, 2009
Merck & Co.
Continue Reading ›

JP Morgan Chase to Pay $75 Million in Penalties and Forfeit $647 Million to Settle SEC Charges Over Alleged Municipal Bond Payment Scam

Published on: November 16, 2009 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

JP Morgan Chase has settled Securities and Exchange Commission charges that the securities firm was allegedly involved in an illegal payment scam to get municipal securities business from Jefferson County, Alabama. As part of its settlement with the SEC, JP Morgan Chase agreed to pay penalties of $75 million and forfeit $647 million in termination fees that it says the county owes. JP Morgan Securities will also pay Jefferson County $50 million, as well as a $25 million penalty. By agreeing to settle, the securities firm is not admitting to or denying the commission’s charges.

The SEC had accused JP Morgan Securities and former managing directors Douglas MacFaddin and Charles LeCroy of making over $8 million in undisclosed payments to friends of certain Jefferson County commissioners. These friends either worked for or owned broker-dealers in the area. The SEC says that these payments led to the commissioners voting for JP Morgan Securities as its managing underwriter of bond offerings. They also voted for JP Morgan Securities’s affiliated bank as the transactions’ swap provider.

The SEC claims JP Morgan Securities charged Jefferson County higher interest rates on swap transactions. This allowed it to pass on the unlawful payments’ costs. According to Robert Khuzami, SEC Enforcement Director, senior bankers with JP Morgan made illegal payments to earn fees and garner business.

The SEC has filed a civil lawsuit against LeCroy and Macfaddin. The SEC is accusing the two men of committing securities fraud for allegedly directing the illegal payments to the Jefferson County commissioners’ associates.

The commission claims the two men knew that the transactions, which occurred between October 2002 and November 2003, were “sham transactions.” The SEC says the men’s failure to disclose these payments or related “conflicts of interest” to either Jefferson County or bond offering investors or the county in the challenged swap agreements deprived those involved of swap agreement negotiations and bond underwriting processes that were impartial and objective. The SEC is seeking disgorgement plus prejudgment interest and permanent injunctions against the two men.

Related Web Resources:
JPMorgan to Pay $75 Million in Alabama Case, NY Times, November 4, 2009
Read the civil complaint (PDF)

Read the administrative complaint (PDF)
Continue Reading ›

SEC to Probe Whether Former Ferris, Baker Watts Inc. General Counsel Failed to Properly Supervise Broker Convicted of Securities Fraud

Published on: November 2, 2009 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The US Securities and Exchange Commission says it will investigate allegations that former Ferris, Baker Watts Inc. general counsel Theodore W. Urban did not properly supervise Stephen Glantz. In 2007, Glantz, who was employed by Ferris for almost thee years, pleaded guilty to lying to law enforcement officials and securities fraud.

The SEC says Urban ignored a number of warnings he received connecting Glantz to questionable activities and unauthorized trades. Urban also allegedly knew that numerous complaints had already been made against Glantz even before he came to work at Ferris. Not only did Glantz’s Form U-4 registration application show 10 customer complaints, but others had warned about his questionable reputation. Yet Urban still gave the broker more freedom than he did other brokers at the firm.

Urban is a former SEC staffer who was an Assistant Director in the Division of Market Regulation. In 2004, he recommended that Ferris, Baker Watts fire Glantz over unsuitable trades involving customer accounts. Urban later backed down from his stance. Instead, he and vice chairman Louis Akers were in agreement that Glantz be put under “special supervision.”

Glantz, another registered representative at another broker-dealer, and Glantz’ client David Dadante, were accused of manipulating the market for Innotrac Corp. Glantz also made unsuitable and unauthorized trades in a number of securities in his customers’ accounts.

Urban, according to his attorney, will contest the allegations.

Royal Bank of Canada subsidiary RBC Wealth Management acquired Ferris for $230 million in 2008.

While financial losses do occur when investing in the market, investor losses that are a result of broker fraud are unacceptable. You shouldn’t have to suffer because a broker or broker-dealer was negligent or engaged in misconduct.