Craig Scott Capital, LLC Loses FINRA Membership After Its Representatives Are Accused of Excessive Trading
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority has expelled Craig Scott Capital, LLC over finding that three of the firm’s registered representatives allegedly engaged in excessive trading in the accounts of customers. The self-regulatory organization said that the charges imposed on customers, including markdowns, markups, and commissions, were not in line with the latter’s financial states and goals.
Now, FINRA is holding Craig Scott Capital accountable for the excessive trading, which it described as churning. This type of excessive trading involves making trades in a customer’s account in order to earn a commission.
FINRA is also accusing the firm of not putting into place and enforcing a “reasonable supervisory system” to prevent excessive trading and failing to properly supervise the registered representatives involved in the alleged wrongdoing so these behaviors could have been prevented. The regulator accused Craig Scott’s owners of not taking reasonable action even though they detected the red flags indicating that excessive trading might be taking place.
CFD Investments Settles FINRA Case Alleging Inadequate Supervision of Nontraditional ETFs
FINRA said that CFD Investments will pay a $30K fine to resolve the regulator’s findings that the firm did not put into place and “enforce” a supervisory system that could properly review the sales of leverage and inverse exchange-traded funds by its representatives. CFD Investment settled without admitting or denying to the findings.
According to the self-regulatory organization, about 150 transactions were involved in CFD Investments’ sales of $2M of non-traditional ETFs to customers. The firm is accused of failing to have adequate written procedures to deal with the risks involved and not formally training the representatives that sold these investments to retail customers. Also, said FINRA, a number of customers ended up holding these ETFs for “long periods” because the firm lacked the surveillance tools to monitor accounts for “potentially unsuitable and lengthy holding periods.”
H. Beck Registered Rep. Accused of Making Unsuitable ETF Recommendations to Pro Athlete
H. Beck is censured and fined $50K following FINRA’s finding that a registered representative at the firm recommended nontraditional exchange traded funds and mining and metals stocks to a customer even though they were not suitable for him. The client, a professional athlete who was an unsophisticated investor and could only handle a moderate degree of risk, lost over $1.1M.
FINRA said that H. Beck let its financial representative recommend nontraditional ETFs even though it hadn’t put into place a supervisory system that could make sure that these were suitable for customers. The firm also failed to provide “specific guidance” to help brokers and their supervisors determine whether a nontraditional ETF would be suitable for an investor.
Also, in this instance, the H. Beck rep. purportedly did not make sure that the investments recommended to the athlete were a good match for his investment portfolio.
The athlete, who filed a securities arbitration claim against H. Beck, has already settled with the firm for $1.5M.
The SSEK Partners Group is a securities law firm that represents investors throughout the US. Contact us today.
More Blog Posts:
Securities Firms: JP Morgan Securities to Pay $1.25 For Inadequate Background Checks of Thousands of Employees and Gray Financial Group Settles with SEC Over Unsuitable Investments to Pension Funds, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, November 22, 2017
Credit Suisse Resolves NY Regulator’s Forex Rigging Probe for $135M, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, November 15, 2017
Singer Financial Corp. Accused of Making Illegal Securities Offering of Promissory Notes to Unsophisticated Investors, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, November 15, 2017
The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. No recipients of content from this site, clients or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient’s state. The content of this Website contains general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. The Firm expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this Website. Read More.