The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority has filed fraud charges against Sandlapper Securities. According to the self-regulatory organization, the small brokerage firm created and sold private placements in saltwater disposal wells in Texas while charging undisclosed markups of up to 270% that eventually totaled over $8M on numerous deals.
Also accused of fraud are Sandlapper CEO Trevor Gordon, firm executive Jack Bixler, and two ex-brokers. FINRA contends that in 2011, the four men set up Tiburon Saltwater Reclamation Fund to invest in these wells. They also established a development company to handle the investments in the wells. However, alleges the SRO, between 12/12 and 7/13, Bixler and Gordon utilized the development company to intervene between the fund and the saltwater disposal well deals and they charged markups ranging from 161-270%. Not only were these markups excessive but also they went undisclosed. This occurred even though the fund could have directly bought interest in the wells.
Also, claims FINRA, beginning in 2013, Gordon began using the development company to obtain ill-gotten profits from investors who bought interest in the saltwater disposal wells. The company bought the interests and then resold them to investors, again at high, undisclosed markups of 67% to 376%.
170 investors purchased $12.5M of the fund’s securities from 8/2011 to 12/2013. Fees, allowances, and commissions were purportedly more than 16% of investors’ funds on the securities. Meantime, according to the private placement memorandum for the fund, its objectives were to not just protect capital but also provide a long-term 15% return.
FINRA, in its complaint, accused Bixler and Gordon of going against the best interests of investors while earning ill-gotten gains. Sandler is accused of having known about the private placement fraud through the two men, who, as fund managers, owed fiduciary obligations that they allegedly violated when they “usurped” investment opportunities to resell the investment with the added markups and did not make sure that the fund was ensured “fair pricing.”
Also, Gordon is accused of numerous conflicts of interest, while Sandlapper purportedly failed to put in place a supervisory structure that could tackle these conflicts. Both he and the broker-dealer are accused of not reasonably supervising sales activities.
According to FINRA’s BrokerCheck, the regulator notified Sandlapper earlier this year that it could be the subject of a disciplinary action over its sale of private placements and direct investments that may have violated securities industry rules. At Shepherd Smith Edwards and Kantas, our Texas private placement fraud lawyers represent investors throughout the state. We also work with investors throughout the US. Our securities law firm has helped thousands of investors to recover money lost because of fraud.
These non-public offerings are often used to raise funds. Private placements are usually sold to accredited investors and they are typically not liquid, meaning that they are not easy to sell or trade on the open market. Private placements are not suitable for all investors. Contact our Texas securities law firm today.
Your initial session is a free, no obligation session to help you determine whether you have grounds for a case. Our clients only pay us from any recovery we obtain for them. We represent private placement fraud clients throughout the US
Broker-dealer charged fraudulent markups of up to 270% on water disposal deals: Finra, InvestmentNews, October 2, 2017
More Blog Posts:
SEC Hacking Raises Concerns That Rogue Traders Might Access Filings in EDGAR Before They Are Public, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, September 22, 2017
Alleged $283M Institutional Investor Fraud Involving Biotech Companies Leads to Criminal Indictments, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, September 18, 2017
Three Ex-Alexander Capital Brokers Charged with Making Unsuitable Recommendations That Cost Investors, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, September 28, 2017
The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. No recipients of content from this site, clients or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient’s state. The content of this Website contains general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. The Firm expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this Website. Read More.