Investor Lawyers Blog

SEC Probes Whether Mutual Fund Managers Are Charging Investors Undisclosed Fees

Published on: July 24, 2015 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The Securities and Exchange Commission is looking into whether Franklin Templeton, Oppenheimer Funds (OPY), J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. (JPM), and other mutual fund managers are charging investors for fund fees that have not been fully disclosed. While money managers are allowed to use some of investors’ money to pay compensation to the brokers who sell a fund’s shares, as well as for certain marketing purposes, the regulator wants to know whether firms are exceeding the allowed limits.

The Commission is trying to find out whether mutual fund companies have come up with ways to make extra payments to brokers by using investor assets to cover certain services, such as the consolidation of client trading records. The agency is worried that proper disclosure of these added fees are not being made to investors. The SEC is also wondering if brokers are more inclined to recommend funds that provide such additional payments, compelling them to prioritize profit over funds.

Fund companies have said that they do properly disclose fees for marketing. Oppenheimer, which is one of the companies that the SEC has investigated over this issue, has said that it doesn’t bill mutual fund clients for recordkeeping costs but that the money comes from the firm.
Continue Reading ›

SEC Awards Over $3M to Whistleblower

Published on: July 24, 2015 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

In the third highest award that the Securities and Exchange Commission has issued under its whistleblower program, the regulator is giving one individual $3 million for providing information that helped expose a complex fraud. The tip provided by the whistleblower included details and specifics about the scam, which would have been difficult to detect otherwise. Related actions also resulted because of the information this person provided.

Since inception four years ago, the SEC whistleblower program has paid out over $50 million to 18 whistleblower. The biggest award to date was $30 million, issued last year. A $14 million whistleblower award was issued in 2013.

Under the program, whistleblowers that provide the regulator with original information that helps the SEC pursue a successful enforcement action are eligible for 10-30% of the money collected if the sanction exceeds $1 million. The SEC is legally bound to protect the confidentiality and identity of whistleblowers.

Puerto Rico Owes $5.4B of Bond Payments

Published on: July 23, 2015 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Puerto Rico owes investors $5.4 billion of bond payments in the next 12 months. A lot of this debt is for COFINA, which is sales tax debt, and securities that were sold by the Government Development Bank.

As a result of the upcoming payments and overall debt of the Commonwealth, Puerto Rico Governor Alejandro Garcia Padilla is continuing to press for a restructure of Puerto Rico’s $72 billion debt, which he claims the island cannot pay. Because Puerto Rico has over a dozen kinds of bonds with different security pledges, negotiations over this debt have proved challenging. While some general obligation bonds are protected by the constitution of the commonwealth, others are revenue-backed. Negotiations must move fast as roughly $1 billion is due in January.

This week, PREPA, Puerto Rico’s public power authority, criticized bondholders’ new offer to refinance billions of dollars in debt. The plan was drafted by 40% of the agency’s bondholders, including investors such as BlueMountain Capital and Franklin Advisors. It would divide roughly $8 billion of debt into two tranches.

One tranche would take the form of capital appreciation bonds, which would allow for payments to be deferred for years. Payment for the first tranche, holding about $5.7 billion of debt, would come with debt relief through 2019. Payments on the second tranche, which would hold $2.4 billion, would not have to be completed until 2035.
Continue Reading ›

U.S. Chamber of Commerce Wants the SEC to Reform Its In-house Trials

Published on: July 23, 2015 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The US Chamber of Commerce is calling on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission make reforms to the way it conducts in-house trials. The Chamber wants the regulator to put into place a uniform policy of when such trials should take place, amend its rules to allow for more pretrial discovery, and set up a process that would let defendants challenge the choice of an in-house venue.

Critics believe that the SEC’s administrative trials violate the Constitution because there is limited discovery and no jury. Depositions are not allowed nor are counterclaims. To appeal a ruling by an administrative law judge, the person has to go to the Commission first before it can go to a circuit court of appeals.

The SEC has increased its use of in-house trials, which are presided over by one of its judges, ever since the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act went into effect. The Chamber of Commerce is concerned that this is causing serious issues of fairness. The lobbying group made nearly forty recommendations, including that the SEC revise certain deadlines and update its rules.

The chamber believes that some of the rules that preside over the SEC in-house court are no longer appropriate for certain complex cases, such as those involving insider trading. It wants more streamlining of investigations, modifications to the Wells notice process, less duplicate efforts among regulators, and clarification of the SEC’s policy regarding admission of guilt in enforcement actions.

Wells Fargo Must Pay Woman Over $8M For Alleged Fraud Involving Childhood Trust

Published on: July 22, 2015 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Wells Fargo Bank (WFC) must pay a Dallas woman over $8 million. Texas State Judge Emily Tobolowsky said that the bank defrauded Angela Militello in its role as trustee for a trust that family members set up for her when she became an orphan at the age of seven.

Militello contends that in 1999, a trust officer sent to her by the bank told her to set up a new account and gave her papers for establishing a revocable trust. After Militello filed for divorce in 2006, she asked the trust officer about withdrawing $200,000 from the trust to purchase a home for her and her child.

The trust officer gave her a check for that amount and a form asking for approval of the completed sale of a percentage of the assets in the trust. The remainder of assets was to be sold within a few months. Militello claims that Wells Fargo and a third party conspired to sell the assets in her trust at way below market value and fraudulently charge her tfor the property taxes after a buyer purchased the assets.

Royal Alliance Must Pay $1.4M To Retirees for Non-traded REIT, Variable Annuities Sales

Published on: July 21, 2015 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. panel says that AIG Advisor Group (AIG) subsidiary Royal Alliance Associates Inc. must pay $1.4 million to three retirees who claim that the brokerage firm was negligent when supervising the sales of variable annuities and nontraded real estate investment trusts.

The investors, who were former AT & T Inc. employees, claim that ex-broker Kathleen Tarr recommended that they take a lump-sum buyout from the communications company instead of a lifetime annuity. The money was then put into non-traded REIT company Inland Real Estate, as well as different variable annuities.

Tarr’s BrokerCheck record shows that she has been named in about forty customer disputes and complaints. She was let go from Royal Alliance in 2010.

The claimants, who are low-wealth, low-income seniors, believe that they should not have been encouraged to take a lump sum and place their funds into non-traded REITs and variable annuities involving an IRA. Even though they did not sustain out-of-pocket losses from the investment recommendations, the retirees purportedly lost out on earnings they would have made if only they had invested their money more reasonably or opted for the lifetime annuity. With the latter, an investor would have given over a lump sum figure in return for a guaranteed payout for the duration of his/her life.
Continue Reading ›

Massachusetts Regulator Probes Alternative Mutual Funds Sold by JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, BlackRock, and Other Financial Advisers

Published on: July 17, 2015 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

William Galvin, the Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth, is investigating the sale of 25 alternative mutual funds, including those created by Wells Fargo (WFC), JPMorgan (JPM), Eaton Vance (EV), and BlackRock (BLK). The state’s securities division sent subpoenas to registered investment advisers that deal with the funds. It noted, however, that receiving a subpoena is “not an indication of wrongdoing at this time.”

A full list of the funds under investigation can be found here. Galvin’s office wants to see documents related to the recommendations the firms made make to retail investors. The Massachusetts regulator’s spokesperson, Brian McNiff, said that the funds were selected because of their size, investment strategies, and sales volumes.

Alternative funds, also called liquid alts, are often marketed as tools that involve hedge-fund-style investment strategies to mitigate risks found in bonds, stocks, and other traditional investments. Alternative funds are not like typical mutual funds. Liquid alts usually hold more investments that are non-traditional. They typically employ trading strategies that are more complex.

Alt funds may invest in global real estate, leveraged loans, commodities, unlisted securities, and start-up companies. Strategies used may include short selling, hedging and leveraging via derivatives, opportunistic tactics that change with market conditions, or even single strategy tactics. There are risks involved.
Continue Reading ›

JPMorgan Settles Class Action Mortgage-Backed Securities Case for $388M

Published on: July 17, 2015 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) has consented to pay $388 million to resolve a securities lawsuit filed by investors claiming that the bank misled them about the safety of $10 billion of mortgage-backed securities (MBSs). Included among the plaintiffs in the case are the Laborers Pension Trust Fund for Northern California, the Fort Worth Employees’ Retirement Fund, and the Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern California.

The funds, and other investors in nine offerings that were made prior to the financial crisis, contend that JPMorgan misled them about the appraisals, underwriting, and credit quality of home loans that were underlying the securities. Following the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. in 2008, the certificates’ value dropped to 62 cents on the dollar.

JPMorgan is settling the case but has denied any wrongdoing. It will be up to a judge to decide on whether to approve the deal.

According to a copy of the securities action filed in 2010, the lawsuit is for entities and persons that acquired the bank’s Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates. The certificates involved were allegedly sold pursuant to or traceable to a misleading Registration Statement from 2007, as well as misleading and false Prospectus Supplements that also were issued that year. According to the Complaint, examples of purportedly false and misleading statements found in offering documents included claims that the loans had received investment grade credit rating, and loans backing the Certificates had specific loan to value ratios.

OppenheimerFunds Says Puerto Rico Can Repay Its $72B Debt

Published on: July 16, 2015 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

OppenheimerFunds Inc. (OPY) is disputing Puerto Rico Governor Alejandro García Padilla’s contention that the island cannot pay back its $72 billion debt. The New York-based mutual fund company said that based on data about income growth, sales-tax collection, and unemployment, the U.S. territory’s economy can withstand repaying creditors.

According to Bloomberg data, as of July 9, OppenheimerFunds, which is the largest holder of Puerto Rico municipal bonds, had about $4.4 billion of uninsured obligations from the island. Aside from insured debt, re-refunded securities, and tobacco bonds, these obligations make up 13.8% of Oppenheimer’s municipal fund holdings.

As Puerto Rico bonds continue to lose value-data shows that this year alone Puerto Rico bonds suffered a 9.5% loss-OppenheimerFunds’ municipal funds also have suffered. Bloomberg reports that for 2015,the company’s state funds in Arizona, Virginia, Maryland, New Jersey, and North Carolina, which all hold Puerto Rico securities, sustained the largest losses among single-state, open-end muni funds.

When García Padilla asked for wide-ranging restructuring of the territory’s debt last month, OppenheimerFunds said it would defend the terms of the bonds it holds. The firm does not believe the territory’s fiscal health will get better even if some of Puerto Rico’s agencies file for bankruptcy protection.
Continue Reading ›

Oz Management to Settle SEC Charges Over Inaccurate Data by Paying $4.25M

Published on: July 16, 2015 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Investment adviser Oz Management, LP has agreed to pay a $4.25M penalty to settle SEC charges that it provided inaccurate trading data to four prime brokers. This led to inaccuracies in the books and records of the brokers, including the inaccurate listing of about 552 million shares. Also, the inaccurate trading information resulted in inaccuracies in the information given to the regulator during investigations.

The SEC’s order said that for almost six years, up through the end of 2013, the firm misidentified certain trades in information given to the brokers. Trade settlement was not impacted. However, in addition to the erroneous listings previously mentioned, the wrong information was also woven into the data that the brokers electronically provided to regulators.

Because of this, about 14.4 million shares were inaccurately reported when addressing SEC requests. It was this inaccurate information that the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority used to make a number of referrals to the agency.

The SEC discovered the purported violations during a 2013 probe when it realized that Oz Management’s files didn’t identify trades the same way as was noted on blue sheets. In certain trades the investment adviser did not characterize the sales as short or long in the same way that they were marked when they were sent to the market. Instead, the trades were filtered according to other factors.