Investor Lawyers Blog

SEC Files Securities Charges Against Massachusetts Company Over Pyramid Scam that Primarily Targeted Immigrants

Published on: April 17, 2014 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The US Securities and Exchange Commission has filed fraud charges against TelexFree Inc. and TelexFree LLC over an alleged Pyramid scam that targeted immigrants-those from Brazil and the Dominican Republic, in particular. The agency sought and was able to obtain an asset freeze, securing millions of dollars.

Also facing charges are a number of TelexFree officers and promoters and several other entities as relief defendants. The Investors involved are located in Massachusetts and 20 other US states.

According to the SEC, the two entities made it appear as if they were operating a multilevel marketing company that sold phone service using VoIP technology when in fact this was a Pyramid scheme. The defendants sold securities as “memberships” along with the promise of 200% or greater yearly returns to people who promoted TelexFree via ad placements and participated in new member recruitment. $300 million was raised.

Barclays Settles Two Libor-Related Securities Cases

Published on: April 16, 2014 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Barclays (BARC) has just settled two Libor-related securities cases alleging mis-selling related to Libor. In the first lawsuit, filed by Guardian Care Homes over interest swaps worth £70M that were linked to the benchmark interest rate, Barclays has agreed to restructure a loan for the home care operator.

The bank had tried to claim the case lacked merit and that it was the home care operator that owed money. Barclays argued that the swaps, purchased in 2007 and 2008, cost the bank millions of pounds when interest rates plunged in the wake of the economic crisis. In 2012, Barclays was fined $450 million for Libor rigging.

The London interbank offered rate is relied on for measuring how much banks are willing to lend each other money. Among the allegations against the firm was that it tried to manipulate and make false reports about benchmark interest rates to benefit its derivatives trading positions. Barclays settled with regulators in the US and the UK.

In the other Libor mis-selling case, the bank has arrived at a “formal” compromise in the securities case involving property firm Domingos Da Silva Teixeira over more rigging claims and Portuguese construction. The company had filed a 11.1 million euro securities case against the bank.

Also, this week, three ex-ICAP (IAP) brokers appeared in court in London to face charges accusing them of running a securities scam to manipulate the Libor benchmark interest rates. ICAP is the biggest interbroker dealer in the world.

The men allegedly engaged in conspiracy to defraud. Their scam allegedly involved Tom Hayes, an ex-yen derivatves trader. He is charged with multiple counts of conspiracy to commit fraud while he worked for UBS (UBS) in Japan.

To date, 10 banks and ICAP have been ordered to pay$6 billion in fines. The Libor rigging scandal spans multiple continents and led to numerous criminal charges. Traders are accused of fixing Libor for profit.

Barclays settles with Guardian Care Homes in Libor-linked court case, The Guardian, April 7, 2014

Three former ICAP brokers in UK court on Libor fixing charges, Reuters, April 15, 2014

Barclays settles second Libor case in week, Yahoo, April 11, 2014

More Blog Posts:
Deutsche Bank, Royal Bank of Scotland Settle & Others for More than $2.3B with European Union Over Interbank Offered Rates, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, December 24, 2013

Barclays LIBOR Manipulation Scam Places Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan Chase, and UBS Under The Investigation Microscope, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, July 16, 2012

SEC Takes a Closer Look at Municipal Bonds

Published on: April 15, 2014 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The US Securities and Exchange Commission is finally beginning to scrutinize municipal bond issuers. Recent efforts include the opening of investigations into whether certain municipalities misled investors about their financial well-being before they made their bonds available to them.

The SEC’s municipal-bond enforcement unit is searching for occurrences involving “tension” involving “disclosures and the subsequent announcements” by municipal issuers of financial problems. The regulator is a telling underwriter and issuers that they will be subject the less harsh penalties if they choose to self-report violations rather than waiting for an enforcement action.

The $3.7 trillion muni bond industry is essential for not just local governments but also for investors. Retail investors, especially senior investors, have long looked to muni bonds for tax-free income.

FINRA Doesn’t Want Oversight Over Financial Advisers, Says CEO Ketchum

Published on: April 12, 2014 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

According to Financial Industry Regulatory Authority CEO Richard G. Ketchum, the regulator no longer wants to be given oversight over financial advisers. Speaking to The Wall Street Journal, Ketchum said the self-regulatory agency had done all it could to be granted authority over investment advisers and has decided to stop with additional attempts.

FINRA currently oversees brokers. Meantime, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the states oversee registered investment advisers. The SEC had been exploring having FINRA or another agency police RIAs instead. However, the majority of investment advisers were against such a move because of the way FINRA handles enforcement. They don’t think the regulator understands the way investment advisers operated.

Ketchum is now saying that Congress should give the SEC the resources it needs to enhance its examination program of advisers. The Commission has been asking for more money because it can only afford to examine investment advisor firms about once a decade, which isn’t much oversight at all.

SAC Capital Advisor’s $1.8B Criminal Securities Fraud Settlement with the DOJ is Accepted by a Federal Judge

Published on: April 12, 2014 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

U.S. District Judge Laura Taylor Swain has approved the criminal settlement reached between the US Department of Justice and SAC Capital Advisors LP. The hedge fund, which was founded by Steven A. Cohen, consented to pay a $1.8 billion penalty and plead guilty to insider trading charges that resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars in illegal profits.

According to an indictment issued last year, for over a decade, insider trading involving stock of over 20 publicly-traded companies occurred at SAC Capital. The hedge fund is pleading guilty to numerous counts of securities fraud and a single count of wire fraud.

Eight of its employees have either been convicted or pleaded guilty over their involvement, including former SAC Capital portfolio managers Mathew Martoma and Michael Steinberg, who were convicted in their trials but will likely appeal. Cohen, however, has not been criminally charged—although the Securities and Exchange Commission did file a civil case against him. The regulator also put forth an administrative action to get Cohen barred from the securities industry because he failed to properly supervise Steinberg and Martoma or prevent the insider trading from happening.

Large Hedge Funds Invested in Puerto Rico Bonds

Published on: April 11, 2014 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

According to The Wall Street Journal, a number of large hedge funds and other nontraditional buyers got involved in Puerto Rico debt last month during the US Territory’s $3.5B bond sale, buying up to 70% of the deal. Brigade Capital Management, Och-Ziff Capital Management (OZM) LLC, Perry Capital LLC, Paulson & Co., and Fir Tree Partners were among those to purchase over $100M of the bonds. Black Rock Inc. (BLK), which is also a hedge fund, bought in as well. However, the list doesn’t indicate whether the firms still hold the bonds or if they have sold them since. (The Municipal Securities Rulemaking says that investors originally holding the bonds have already sold about $1.7 billion of the bond since it was issued.)

Some of the other buyers that bought into the Puerto Rico bond sale in March were Harvard University, OppenheimerFunds (OPY), a unit of Gannet Co., and a number of banks, insurers, and retail investors. (Also, many investors may not be aware of this but as of the end of last year, David Lerner Associates, the privately held broker-dealer that was the exclusive distributor of the troubled Apple non-traded REITs had invested in a big way in Puerto Rico debt via its Spirit of America Hi Yield Fund.)

Since the bond sale, underwritten by Morgan Stanley (MS), Barclays (BARC), and RBC Capital Markets (RBC), the prices of Puerto Rico bonds have dropped. Prior to the sale the major credit rating agencies had downgraded the bonds to junk status, and many investors who bought into Puerto Rico municipal bonds through firms such as UBS (UBS), Banco Santander (SAN), Banco Popular, and other brokerage firms, were already filing securities fraud claims over their investment losses.

SEC Files Charges Over Securities Fraud Scams that Used YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, & Other Social Media

Published on: April 9, 2014 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The US Securities and Exchange Commission has filed securities fraud charges against Joseph Signore, Paul L. Schumack II, and their respective companies for their Florida-based Ponzi scam that purportedly used YouTube videos to target hundreds of US investors to get them to invest in virtual concierge machines that were supposed to garner 300-500% returns in four years. The two companies are T.B.T.I. Inc. and JCS Enterprises Inc.

According to the SEC, the two men and their companies falsely promised investors that their money would go toward the purchase of these ATM-like machines, which businesses would then use to promote services and products via touch screen, coupons, or printable tickets. The machines were to be placed at airports, hotels, and stadiums.

Instead, contends the regulator, Schumack, Signore, and their companies used investors’ funds in Ponzi scam-fashion, taking new investors money to pay the “returns” of earlier investors and paying for their personal expenses (including credit card bills, restaurants, unrelated business ventures, and family spending).

SEC Says At Least 200 Private-Equity Firms Imposed Bogus Fees

Published on: April 9, 2014 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

According to the US Securities and Exchange Commission, over half of the approximately private-equity firms that it examined have charged unjustified expenses and fees to investors without their knowledge. The regulator’s findings are from its review of the $3.5 trillion industry.

It was the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act that gave the SEC more oversight over money managers, which allowed the agency to scrutinize some firms for the very first time. By the end of 2012, examiners had discovered that certain advisers were wrongly collecting money from companies included in their portfolio, improperly calculating fees, and using assets from the funds to pay for their own expenses. Bloomberg reports that a source in the know about the regulator’s findings said that while some of the issues seem to stem from mistakes, others might have been intentional.

SEC to Look Even More Closely At Private Funds

US Supreme Courts Broadens SOX Whistleblower Protections

Published on: April 4, 2014 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

In Lawson v. FMR LLC, the US Supreme Court held that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act does extend its whistleblower protections to include employees of privately held contractors that do work for public companies. The Supreme Court case was filed by two ex-employees of privately held companies engaged in mutual funds investments.

The plaintiffs contend that their employers acted against them for bringing up issues they had related to mutual funds. Meantime, their former employers tried to have the lawsuits dismissed, contending that because the plaintiffs had been employees of privately held companies, they could not avail of the whistleblower protections under the SOX Act. Such protections prohibit retaliation against an employee by any officer, contractor, employee, agent, or subcontractor of a public company.

Although previous to Lawson, other federal district courts had made the same assertion, in this latest case, the district court said that the whistleblower provision does in fact protect the employees of any related entity of a public company. This protection would therefore apply to the Lawson plaintiffs.

PNC Bank Sues Morgan Stanley & Ex-Trust Adviser For “Surreptitious Conspiracy”

Published on: April 3, 2014 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

In U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, PNC Bank (PNC) is suing Emily Daly, one of its ex-trust advisers, and her employer Morgan Stanley (MS). According to InvestmentNews, The bank contends that Daly allegedly stole trade secrets, solicited its clients, and violated her employment agreement when she switched firms. Meantime, Morgan Stanley is accused of helping her bring over the confidential data about clients.

Banks don’t like it when advisers take their customers with them when they go to another firm and nonsolicitation agreements can be violated as a result. Also, under PNC’s employment contract, employees are not allowed to take data that isn’t general industry knowledge or from a public source when they leave a firm. The bank contends that Daly helped transfer over $250 million in client assets to Morgan Stanley, which allowed the firm to make fees of about $ 1 million.

Daly even purportedly used her cell phone to take pictures of her computer screen when internal measures made it impossible to download lists of clients. Boxes of client data that were in Daly’s office are said to have gone missing.