Investor Lawyers Blog

Mixed Securities Verdict Reached in SEC Case Against Texas-Based Life Partners Holdings

Published on: February 19, 2014 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Even though jurors rendered a mixed verdict in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s financial fraud lawsuit in Texas against Life Partners Holdings Inc. (LPHI), the company still may have ended up with the better outcome because the Texas life-insurance investments seller won some of the bigger claims. Still, Even as Life Partners is declaring the securities case outcome a victory, Andrew Ceresney, the Commission’s enforcement director, said the agency was pleased that the defendants were found liable for defrauding shareholders and submitting SEC filings that were false.

In U.S. District Court in Austin, Texas, the regulator had accused Life Partners of disclosure and accounting fraud that purportedly went on for years and were related to misleading marketing practices that allegedly occurred during the sale of life-insurance investments to customers. While jurors turned down the SEC’s primary insider trading and fraud allegations, they found the company and two of its executives liable in a securities fraud violation of a narrower scope involving revenue-recognition practices. Also, Life Partners’ CEO Brian D. Pardo and general counsel R. Scott Peden were were found liable for their role in the filing of false reports, and Pardo also was found to have falsely certified company filings.

Meantime, Life Partners continues to be the defendant in a number of Texas securities cases, including one involving 207 plaintiffs in Dallas who went through the company to invest in life policies. State regulators also have a separate Texas securities fraud lawsuit against Life Partners they are appealing in the wake of the decision by a state judge to turn down some of the main claims it made in 2012. The Texas State Securities Board has been looking into allegations that the life settlement provider misled investors of life insurance policies.

Lehman Brothers Holdings’ $767M Mortgage Settlement to Freddie Mac is Approved by Judge

Published on: February 19, 2014 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

A judge in US bankruptcy court has approved the $767 million mortgage securities settlement reached between Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and Freddie Mac (FMCC). The deal involves a $1.2 billion claim over two loans made by the mortgage giant to Lehman prior to its collapse in 2008.

As part of the accord, Freddie will provide loan data to the failed investment bank so that Lehman can go after mortgage originators over alleged misrepresentations. Lehman will pay the $767 million in a one-time transaction.

Its bankruptcy was a main trigger to the 2008 global economic crisis. According to Matthew Cantor, chief general counsel of the unwinding estate, the bank has already paid creditors $60 billion, with more payouts.

Three Ex-Barclays Employees Charged by UK Prosecutors in Libor Rigging Scandal

Published on: February 18, 2014 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Prosecutors in the United Kingdom are charging three ex-Barclays Plc (ADR) employees with conspiring to manipulate the London interbank offered rate. The Serious Fraud Office charged Jonathan James Mathew, Peter Charles Johnson, and Styilianos Contogoulas with conspiring to defraud. These are the first criminal charges involving the manipulation of the US dollar Libor.

Over a dozen firms are under investigation by regulators and prosecutors around the world over collusion in rigging the London interbank offered rate and related benchmarks. Mathew and Johnson were employed by Barclays, the first firm fined ($450 million) over Libor by UK and US authorities two years ago, between 2001 through September 2012. Contogoulas, who worked with Barclays from 2002 through 2006, was with Merrill Lynch (MER) after that through September 2012.

Previous to the allegations against Contogoulas, Johnson, and Mathew, criminal charges against persons in the UK and the US solely had involved an alleged rate-manipulating ring led by trader Tom Hayes, a former Citigroup Inc. (C) and UBS AG (UBS) employee. He pleaded not guilty to US charges. With this latest criminal case against the three men, 13 individuals now face criminal cases in the UK probe into Libor.

Hedge Funds Interested in Upcoming Puerto Rico Bond Offering Want The Territory to Borrow Money To Last Two Years

Published on: February 17, 2014 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

In the wake of Puerto Rico’s plans to sell $2 billion of general-obligation debt to try to balance its beleaguered budget, the hedge funds planning to get involved in this latest bond offering are asking the US territory to raise enough funds to last two years. Reportedly, the hedge funds also want the Commonwealth to surrender its sovereign immunity, which would let bondholders sue in New York court instead of dealing with the Puerto Rican judicial system.

The reported hedge funds’ requests point to the awareness that risks involving Puerto Rico have gone up. Just this month, Moody’s Investors Service, Fitch Ratings, and Standard and Poor’s all downgraded the U.S. territory to junk status. Aside from the planned Puerto Rico bond offering, which is being underwritten by Morgan Stanley (MS), Barclays Plc (BCS), and RBC Capital Markets (RBC), legislation is in the works to give the Commonwealth up to $3.5 billion of borrowing capacity.

As of the end of June, the US territory and its agencies had outstanding debt of roughly $70 billion. The downgrades by the credit rating agencies led to $940 million of accelerated payments on swap fees and debt, with close to half due in 30 days.

SEC Charges Two Wall Street Traders With Securities Fraud in “Parking” Scam

Published on: February 15, 2014 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The Securities and Exchange Commission is charging Ryan King and Thomas Gonnella with securities fraud over a bogus “parking” scam. According to its Enforcement Division, the two Wall Street traders tried to get a round a firm policy that places a penalty for holding securities too long, and one of them purportedly placed securities in the trading books of the other so such fees wouldn’t be imposed and end up affecting his annual bonus.

The two men worked at different firms. According to the SEC, Gonnella asked King to help him get around his firm’s policy by arranging for the latter to buy securities that he would then later buy from King’s firm at a profit. By parking the securities in King’s trading book to reset the holding period, Gonnella was seeking to avoid charges to his trading profits and bonus as a result of inventory.

Per the administrative orders, Gonnella parked about 10 securities with King. The alleged round-up trades purportedly caused Gonnella’s firm to lose about $174,000.

OppenheimerFunds Increases Its Exposure to Puerto Rico Debt Despite Downgrade by Moody’s, S & P, and Fitch to Junk Status

Published on: February 14, 2014 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Even though Puerto Rico’s debt has been downgraded to “junk” status by the three major ratings agencies (Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s, and Fitch Ratings), OppenheimerFunds (OPY) has increased its holding of Puerto Rican debt in two of its municipal bond funds that carry lower risk. The credit raters downgraded the US Commonwealth over worries about its failing economy and decreased ability to finance its deficits in capital markets.

According to Reuters, Lipper Inc. says that at the end of last year, the Oppenheimer Rochester Short-Term Municipal Fund’s (ORSCX) exposure to Puerto Rico’s debt had risen 13% from a year ago, while its Intermediate-Term Municipal Fund more than doubled its exposure to 17%. (Details of the holdings in both funds since then are still unavailable.) Both have a 5% limit on how much junk-rated debt they can contain. However, because the US territory’s debt was downgraded after the buys were made, Oppenheimer, which is part of MassMutual Financial Group, may not obligated to unload the assets.

The company has continued to support Puerto Rico municipal bonds, even as a lot of other mutual fund firms have lowered their exposure to Puerto Rico debt. This week, Oppenheimer downplayed the investment risk involved, noting that most bonds involved are insured (Reuters reports that 27% of the holdings in the intermediate-fund and another 4% in the short-term fund, do not have insurance).

FINRA Awards Nearly $1M in Florida Non-traded-REIT Cases

Published on: February 14, 2014 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority has ordered two Retirement Securities Inc. and Sterling Enterprises Group Inc. to pay an individual and two trusts over $900,000 in a Non-traded real estate investment trust case. The individual is investor Kristopher Brownlow and the two trusts are the Martha H. Mason Trust and the Derek Mason Trust. Both Retirement Securities and Sterling Enterprises are no longer registered with FINRA.

The two trusts and Brownlow brought the case to the SRO, contending that they lost money because of the investments that Sterling Enterprises and Retirement Securities recommended to them. Per FINRA documents, the investments were made in REITS offered by Inland American Real Estate Trust Inc. and they were non-tradable. Inland Real Estate Trust Inc. is one of the biggest non-traded REITs with over $11 billion in assets.

At the dispute resolution hearing, the claimants argued that the investment advisors breached their fiduciary duty, were negligent, took part in common law fraud, violated the Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act, and breached contracts. Except for the allegation involving the Florida act, all allegations were thrown out.

SEC Restructures Trial Unit in an Effort to Decrease Courtroom Losses

Published on: February 13, 2014 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

In the wake of recent losses in the courtroom, the Securities and Exchange Commission is changing up the way it gets ready for trial. The Wall Street Journal says that SEC Chairwoman Mary Jo White has retooled the agency’s trial unit. One of the reasons for the restructuring is so litigators and investigators can work more closely together.

The SEC’s victory rate has been dropping. The agency won just 55% of trials in the last four months, which a definite decline compared to the last three years when it had been winning over 75% of the time. Since October, however, juries and judges have ruled in favor of 10 out of 25 persons and firms in securities litigation against the SEC, and the government lost 5 of 11 trials. This is a definite downswing from the 12 months prior when just 5 of 34 defendants beat the regulator. Although the cases that the regulator lost were filed before White took over the helm, defense lawyers believe that the Commission’s current losing trend will compel more people to go up against it instead of settling.

The Commission’s trial unit has now been split into four groups so that this more closely mirrors the work of enforcement officials when they probe cases. Senior officials are also conducting practice openings for trials.

Ex-Bank of America Corp. Executive Enters Guilty Plea in Municipal Bond Rigging Scam

Published on: February 12, 2014 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Phillip D. Murphy, an ex-Bank of America Corp. (BAC) executive that used to run the municipal derivatives desk there, has pleaded guilty to wire fraud and conspiracy charges in a muni bond rigging case accusing him of conspiring to bilk the US government and bond investors. In federal court, he admitted to manipulating the bidding process involving investment agreements having to do with municipal bond proceeds.

The illegal activity was self-reported by his former employer. Bank of America has been cooperating with prosecutors that have accused bankers of paying kickbacks to CDR Financial Products to fix bids on investment contracts purchased by local governments. The contracts were bought using money from bond sales.

According to the indictments, from 1998 to 2006, Murphy and CDR officials conspired to up the amount and profitability of investment deals and municipal finance contracts that went to Bank of America. Murphy purportedly won actions for certain contracts after other banks consented to purposely turn in losing bids.

FINRA Seeks to Limit Definition of Public Arbitrator

Published on: February 11, 2014 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

According to Investment News and The Wall Street Journal, sources in the know say that the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority wants to limit how many brokerage industry insiders can act as arbitrators in investor disputes with broker-dealers and brokers. The amendment would keep anyone affiliated with the securities industry, including lawyers and ex-brokers, from representing themselves in the role of public arbitrator. FINRA’s board of directors will decide whether to approve a proposed rule changes on this matter at a meeting this week.

Under the FINRA arbitration system, there are two arbitarator categories: nonpublic and public. Public arbitrators usually don’t have a current insider industry connection with the securities industry. Meantime, arbitrators that are nonpublic can have current ties, even working as a banker or a broker or securities fraud lawyer.

Usually, there are three arbitrators on a panel presiding over an investor-broker dispute. The panel members are selected from a list of arbitrators. Respondents and claimants go through this list to eliminate those they don’t want on the panel.