Investor Lawyers Blog

Bank of America to Pay $335M to Countrywide Financial Corp. Borrowers Over Allegedly Discriminating Lending Practices

Published on: December 21, 2011 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Bank of America Corp. has agreed to a record $335 million settlement to pay back Countrywide Financial Corp. borrowers who were billed more for loans because of their nationality and race, while creditworthiness and other objective criteria took a back seat. All borrowers that were discriminated against qualified to receive mortgage loans under Countrywide’s own underwriting standards.

The settlement is larger than any past fair-lending settlements (totaling $30M) that the US Justice Department has been able to obtain to date. Countrywide was acquired by Bank of America in 2008.

According to the Justice Department, Countrywide charged higher fees and interest rates to over 200,000 Hispanic and black borrowers while directing minorities to more costly subprime mortgages despite the fact that they qualified for prime loans. Meantime, the latter were given to non-Hispanic white borrowers who had similar credit profiles.

SEC Sues SIPC Over R. Allen Stanford Ponzi Payouts

Published on: December 20, 2011 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

In its latest effort to help investors that lost money in the $7 billion Stanford Financial Group Ponzi scam recoup their losses, the Securities and Exchange Commission is suing the Securities Investor Protection Corporation. Both have been in disagreement over whether Stanford investors qualify for protection against SIPC rules, which are supposed to back brokerage firm client accounts against failure and cover investors for up to $500,000 in losses.

The SEC has said that this coverage should apply to Stanford investors because not only was broker-dealer Stanford Group Company a part of Stanford Financial, but also clients had to set up brokerage accounts to buy the certificate of deposits that their money was placed in. Upon purchase of their CD’s, they were given papers noting that the transaction was SIPC-covered. However, the SIPC, which is not in charge of regulating brokerage firms, contends that because clients’ money was placed in supposedly safe CDs sold by Stanford Financial, investors do not get to avail of this protection.

Now the Commission is seeking a court order that would compel the investor protection corporation to start liquidating Stanford Group Company. This filing is a key step in allowing customers to start getting their money back.

The SEC claims that it is solely authorized to decide whether SIPC should get involved. This is the first time the Commission has pulled rank to force the SIPC to take specific action. If the court grant’s the SEC’s order, SPIC plans to appeal.

Federal authorities seized Stanford Financial in 2009. R. Allen Stanford is accused of running the Ponzi scam and using the money belonging more than 21,000 clients to fund his expensive lifestyle. Investors were promised improbable interest rates that were supposedly spurred by a unique investment strategy.

This week, a hearing to determine whether R. Allen Stanford is fit to stand trial is scheduled to take place. The SEC has sued R. Allen Stanford for securities fraud and he is charged with 23 criminal counts of wrongdoing. Although he remains in federal custody, his criminal trial was delayed to allow him to go into detox for his addiction to anti-anxiety meds and anti-depressants.

One of his defense attorneys claims that the medications and a traumatic brain injury that he sustained when he was beaten in jail have caused him to develop amnesia. Meantime, prosecutors are expected to argue that Stanford is pretending that he severe memory loss.

Allen Stanford’s Move to Trial or Treatment Argued in Court, SF Gate, December 20, 2011
SEC, SIPC ready to rumble over Ponzi payouts, Investment News, December 20, 2011
S.E.C. Files Suit to Recoup Losses in Stanford Case, New York TImes, December 12, 2011

More Blog Posts:
Texas Securities Fraud: Unregistered Adviser Confesses to Selling Almost $400K in Promissory Notes and Investments Despite Cease and Desist Order, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, December 5, 2011
Texas Securities Fraud: Raymond James Financial Services Pays Elderly Senior Investor About $1.8M Following Loss of Appeal, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, December 2, 2011
Former Texan and First Capital Savings and Loan To Pay $4.5M for Alleged Foreign Currency Ponzi Scheme, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, November 11, 2011 Continue Reading ›

Daniel “Rudy” Ruettiger Faces SEC Charges Over Pump-and-Dump Scam Involving Sports Drink Company

Published on: December 19, 2011 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

18 years after he was immortalized in the movie “Rudy,” Daniel Ruettiger and 12 others now face Securities and Exchange Commission charges. They are accused of misleading investor to get them to purchase stock in Ruettiger’s sports drink company Rudy Nutrition. Their alleged pump-and-dump scam resulted in over $11 million in illicit profits.

To settle the SEC securities charges, Ruettiger has consented to pay $382,866, while 10 of the others agreed to final judgments. By settling, they are not admitting to or denying any wrongdoing.

Per the SEC’s complaint, although Ruettiger’s sports drink company manufactured the drink called Rudy, Rudy Nutrition was actually a way for Ruettiger’s and his alleged co-conspirators to run their financial scheme. The Commission says that penny stock promoter Stephen DeCesare, who was brought in to turn Ruettiger’s company into a publicly traded one, was the main organizer of the pump stock scam. After Rudy Nutrition was given the ticker symbol RUNU, DeCesare and disbarred California attorney Kevin Quinn arranged for nominee entities to get three billion RUNU shares. The entities sold nearly one billion of them to investors through the public market. Other penny stock promoters then joined forces with DeCesare to engage in manipulative trading and fraudulent touting.

The SEC says that promoters involved in the pump-and-dump scam took part in manipulative trading so that Rudy Nutrition’s stock price would artificially inflate. Meantime, investors who were allegedly given misleading statements and false information through press releases about the company, as well as via promotional materials, were sold unregistered shares.

The misleading statements and bogus information were sent to millions via mailers, online chat rooms, and videos posted on the Internet. In less than four week, RUNU was trading 3 million shares (up from 720 shares). Within 14 days RUNU’s stock price went from a quarter to $1.05.

In September 2008, the SEC suspended trading because RUNU was delinquent with its periodic filings. This brought the pump-and-dump scam (the alleged fraudsters were conspiring to put out another two billion shares that they would dump at the end of the month) to a halt. The Commission took back Rudy Nutrition securities’ registration in November 2008.

Other participants slapped with SEC charges:
• Rocky Brandonisio, Rudy Nutrition President • Stephen DeCesare, penny stock promoter • Kevin Quinn, attorney and business consultant • Kevin Kaplan, Rudy Nutrition CFO • Pawl Dynkowski, stock promoter • Mehmet Mustafoglu, Rudy Nutrition consultant • Gregg Mulholland, stock promoter • Joseph Padilla, ex-registered representative at Scottsdale Capital Advisors and stock promoter • Andrea Ritchie, registered representative with Scottsdale Capital Advisers • Gary Yocom, registered representative with Thomas Anthony and Associates • Angelo Panetta, stock promoter • Chad Smanjak, stock promoter
Pump-and-Dump Scams
Usually involves stocks that are promoted and then sold when the price goes up enough due to a rise in interest because of the endorsement. This allows those involved in running the pump and dump scheme to make a significant short-term profit.

SEC Complaint (PDF)

More Blog Posts:
FBI Arrests Texas Leader of Pump-and-Dump Scheme, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, March 23, 2011
Ex-Gilford Securities Broker Indicted in International Stock Fraud Scam Involving Pump and Dump of Israeli and Chinese Securities, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, February 19, 2011
Pump & Dump Scam Alleged in $600 Million Lawsuit Against Law Firm Baker & McKenzie, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, April 13, 2011 Continue Reading ›

Well Fargo Advisers to Pay $2 Million to Settle Claims that Broker Sold Unsuitable Reverse Convertible Securities to Seniors

Published on: December 17, 2011 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

To settle Financial Industry Regulatory Authority securities fraud allegations against one of its brokers, Wells Fargo Advisers will pay a $2M fine, as well as repay an unspecified amount to elderly clients that were defrauded. Over 21 senior investors were reportedly targeted by Alfred Chi Chen, who sold them reverse convertible notes even though the majority of them were retired and/or had never invested in this type of complex instrument. A number of investors were in their 80’s and 90’s.

FINRA says that Chen made over $1M in commissions even as the investors sustained losses. He also is accused of not giving discounts on Unit Investment Trust (UIT) transactions even when clients were eligible. As part of its settlement, Wells Fargo will pay restitution to those that should have but did not get the discounts and those that were sold unsuitable investments.

FINRA Executive Vice President and Chief of Enforcement Brad Bennett said that Wells Fargo did not review the reverse convertible transactions to make sure that they were suitable and that investors were harmed as a result. The SRO also determined that Wells Fargo did not give certain clients that were eligible breakpoint and rollover and exchange discounts when they bought UITs because the financial firm’s procedures and systems were not sufficient to properly monitor unsuitable reverse convertibles and ensure that clients got the discounts for which they were eligible. (Discounts should be offered on UIT sales when purchases go beyond certain thresholds or involve termination or redemption proceeds from another UIT during the initial offering period.)

By agreeing to settle, Wells Fargo is not admitting to or denying FINRA’s allegations.

The SRO has filed a separate complaint against Chen, who allegedly exposed clients to risks that were not in line with their investment profiles. As of June 2008, 172 of the accounts he worked with held reverse convertibles. 148 accounts had concentrations over the 50% of their total holdings. 46 accounts had concentrations of over 90%.

Reverse Convertibles
These interest-bearing notes involve repayment of principal connected to an underlying asset’s performance. The specific terms of reverse convertibles may vary. An investor risks loss if the underlying asset’s value drops under a certain maturity level or during the reverse convertible’s term.

It is important for many elderly investors that their investments not expose them to too much risk. For an elderly senior to lose his/her life savings because a financial firm or broker behaved irresponsibly, committed securities fraud, or made an avoidable mistake is unacceptable.

Wells to pay $2M to settle claims broker sold unsuitable investments to seniors, Investment News, December 15, 2011
Wells Fargo Fined by Finra Selling Structured Notes to Aged, Bloomberg, December 15, 2011

More Blog Posts:
Broker-Dealers are Making Reverse Convertible Sales That are Harming Investors, Says SEC, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, July 28, 2011
RBC Wealth Management Unit Ferris Baker Watts to Pay Investors Restitution Over Reverse Convertible Notes Allegations, Says FINRA, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, October 23, 2010
Wells Fargo Settles for $148M Municipal Bond Bid-Rigging Charges Against Wachovia Bank, Institutional Investors Securities Blog, December 8, 2011 Continue Reading ›

Investors Want JP Morgan Chase & Co. To Explain Over $95B of Mortgage-Backed Securities

Published on: December 17, 2011 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Institutional investors that placed their money in over $95B in mortgage-backed securities want the trustees overseeing JP Morgan & Chase. Co.-issued securities to figure out whether certain loans shouldn’t have been included as a result of faulty underwriting. US Bank, Bank of New York Mellon, Wells Fargo & Co., HSBC, and Citibank are the trustees.

PIMCO and BlackRock Inc. are two of the institutional investors requesting the investigation. According to their legal representatives, the group of investors represent over 25% of voting rights on 243 residential mortgage-backed securities. The institutional investors want to know whether mortgages that were not eligible ended up included in the collateral backing the bonds. The investor group is the same one that reached an $8.5 billion securities settlement with Bank of America. (The 22 investors include the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Black Rock Inc., Goldman Sachs Asset Management, MetLife Inc., and PIMCO). However, the settlement is still pending and has been challenged by other mortgage bondholders.

Related to this current requested probe, JP Morgan and its different arms put out the securities between 2005 and 2007. Included were bonds from Washington Mutual and Bear Stearns. About $450 billion in residential MBS were issued by JP Morgan to investors between 2005 and 2008. Approximately $169 billion of that principal is outstanding.

A lot of the loans were not originated at JP Morgan, but the investment bank and its other entities did buy them. JP Morgan has contented that it should be the originator that should buy back the loans that were part of the securities contract.

According to the New York Times, if investors were to settle with JP Morgan by applying the same loss ratio used in arriving at the Bank of America agreement, this figure would probably hit about $1.9 billion. Meantime, JP Morgan must contend with approximately $31 billion in securities class-action cases.

Because of mortgage-related concerns, beginning in 2010, JP Morgan placed $8.5 billion into its reserves for litigation. At the end of the third quarter, the investment bank’s mortgage repurchase reserves were $3.6 billion.

Meantime, state attorneys generals and the Federal Housing Finance Agency continue to look at how investment banks handled mortgage-backed securities leading up to the housing market. More securities litigation from investors is expected.

Investors target JPMorgan over $95 billion of RMBS, Gulf News, December 16, 2011

Mortgage Investors Put J.P. Morgan in Cross Hairs, The Wall Street Journal, December 17, 2011

Bank of America in $8.5 billion settlement, CNN, June 29, 2011

More Blog Posts:
Bank of America’s Merrill Lynch Settles for $315 million Class Action Lawsuit Over Mortgage-Backed Securities, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, December 6, 2011

FDIC Objects to Bank of America’s Proposed $8.5B Settlement Over Mortgage-Backed Securities, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, August 30, 2011

Some of the SEC Charges Against Investment Adviser Over Alleged Involvement In J.P. Morgan Securities LLC Collateralized Debt Obligation Are Dismissed, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, September 24, 2011

Three Investment Advisers Charged with Massachusetts Securities Fraud

Published on: December 16, 2011 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Massachusetts securities regulators have filed three actions accusing investment advisers of defrauding investors of millions. The cases come as the state is getting ready to oversee even more investment advisers in 2012.

One of the securities fraud actions filed is against unregistered adviser John B. Wilson, who regulators want to ban from the securities industry for life. Wilson is accused of defrauding 25 investors who gave him over $1.5M. The funds were placed in JBW Capital LLC.

Wilson lost over 90% of the funds in 2 trades he made during one month in ’08. He has admitted to having a trading addiction.

In the second Massachusetts securities case, RIA Daniel A. McKenna allegedly raised over $1M from investors over a 17-year period. He did this by selling shares in Principle Profits Asset Management. In fact, the shares were worthless. He also allegedly persuaded investors to lend his company money, which he never paid back.

Meantime, state regulators are accusing another RIA, Sean Michael O’Brien and Andover Equity Investment Group LLC of using clients’ money to pay for his own expenses, charging “exorbitant” fees, and issuing untrue statements to investigators. For example, he allegedly told the state that TD Ameritrade Holding Corp. division “thinkorswim,” which was his custodian broker-dealer, never asked him about his advisory fees. (His management fee was 15.54% even though the average for the industry is .5%-2%.) However, it turns out that TD Ameritrade asked O’Brien about the fees and eventually terminated his use of the company’s platform.

The state wants investors to get their money back. Regulators also want to take back the registrations of both O’Brien and McKenna.

Currently, there are 739 RIA’s under Massachusetts’ watch. Per the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which mandates that midsize investment advisers go from federal to state supervision next year, another 200 more RIA’s will fall under the state’s watch. (Midsize advisers have assets ranging from $25M and $100M).

Referring to these latest securities actions, Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin said that they show the state’s willingness to go after investment advisers that have violated securities laws.

Our stockbroker fraud lawyers represent investors throughout the US. If you believe that a registered investment adviser or broker-dealer may have defrauded you, please contact our securities fraud law firm. You may have a Massachusetts securities claim on your hands.

Over the years, Shepherd Smith Edwards and Kantas LTD LLP has helped thousands of investors throughout the US to recoup their investment. Your first consultation with us is free.

Massachusetts Signals Strict Oversight Of Investment Advisers, The Wall Street Journal, December 14, 2011
Massachusetts charges three advisers with varying flavors of fraud, Investment News, December 18, 2011

More Blog Posts:
Colorado Securities Fraud: Universal Consulting Resources LLC and Owner Richard Dalton to Pay $15.8M to Settle SEC Lawsuit Over Ponzi Scam, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, December 9, 2011
LPL Financial Ordered to Pay $100K for Lack of Adequate Oversight that Resulted in Unsuitable Investments for Clients, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, November 29, 2011
Texas Securities Fraud: Unregistered Adviser Confesses to Selling Almost $400K in Promissory Notes and Investments Despite Cease and Desist Order, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, December 5, 2011 Continue Reading ›

Former Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Executives Face SEC Securities Fraud Charges

Published on: December 16, 2011 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The Securities and Exchange Commission has charged six ex-executives of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) and the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) with securities fraud. The Commission claims that they not only knew that misleading statements were being made claiming that both companies had minimal holdings of higher-risk mortgage loans but also they approved these messages.

The six people charged are former Freddie Mac CEO and Chairman of the Board Richard F. Syron, ex-Chief Business Officer and Executive Vice President Patricia L. Cook, and former ex-Single Family Guarantee Executive Vice President Donald J. Bisenius. The three ex-Fannie Mae executives that the SEC has charged are former CEO Daniel H Mudd, ex-Fannie Mae’s Single Family Mortgage Executive Vice President Thomas A. Lund, and ex- Chief Risk Officer Enrico Dallavecchia.

In separate securities fraud lawsuits, the SEC accuses the ex-executives of causing Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae to issue materially misleading statements about their subprime mortgage loans in public statements, SEC filings, and media interviews and investor calls. SEC enforcement director Robert Khuzami says that the former executives “substantially” downplayed what their actual subprime exposure “really was.”

The SEC contends that in 2009, Fannie told investors that its books had about $4.8 billion of subprime loans, which was about .2% of its portfolio, when, in fact, the mortgage company had about $43.5 billion of these products, which is about 11% of its holdings. Meantime, in 2006 Freddie allegedly told investors that its subprime loans was somewhere between $2 to 6 billion when, according to the SEC, its holdings were nearer to $141 billion (10% of its portfolio). By 2008, Freddie had $244 billion in subprime loans, which was 14% of its portfolio.

Yet despite these facts, the ex-executives allegedly continued to maintain otherwise. For example, the SEC says that in 2007, Freddie CEO Syron said the mortgage firm had virtually “no subprime exposure.”

It was in 2008 that the government had to bail out both Fannie and Freddie. It continues to control both companies. The rescue has already cost taxpayers approximately $150 billion, and the Federal Housing Finance Administration, which acts as its governmental regulator, says that this figure could rise up to $259 billion.

Today, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae both entered into agreements with the government that admitted their responsibility for their behavior without denying or admitting to the charges. They also consented to work with the SEC in their cases against the ex-executives.

The Commission is seeking disgorgement of ill-gotten gains plus interest, financial penalties, officer and director bars, and permanent and injunctive relief.

SEC Charges Former Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Executives with Securities Fraud, SEC, December 16, 2011

More Blog Posts:
Former US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson Told Hedge Funds About Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Bailouts in Advance, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, November 30, 2011

Morgan Keegan Settles Subprime Mortgage-Backed Securities Charges for $200M, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, June 29, 2011

Freddie Mac and Fannie May Drop After They Delist Their Shares from New York Stock Exchange, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, June 25, 2010

SEC Charges Father and Son with Utah Securities Fraud In Alleged $220M Ponzi Scam Over Purported Real Estate Investments

Published on: December 15, 2011 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The SEC has charged Wendell A. Jacobson and his son Allen R. Jacobson with securities fraud. The two men allegedly ran a $220M Ponzi scam under the guise of selling investments in their real estate business. The Commission claims that father and son violated sections of the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.

The Jacobsons are accused of presenting investors with a chance to place their money in LLC in return for partial ownership in apartment communities that were located in a number of states. The two men, who belonged to Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, solicited other members to invest.

The father and son claimed to have bought apartment complexes at discount prices. They said they would renovate the units, enhance management, and resell properties in 5 years. Investors were told they would be paid their shares in monthly rentals and the future resales.

Per the securities complaint, the father and son team got over $220M from about 225 investors. Securities were sold as investment contracts. No registration statement was submitted to the SEC, which is required under federal securities law.

The Utah securities scam was operated under the umbrella company Management Solutions, Inc. The SEC says the two men behaved as unregistered brokers who made false claims when they told investors that their investment’s principal was safe. They also allegedly misrepresented how the money would be used. Meantime, investors were told that they would get 5-8% annual returns and resale profits.

In fact, says the SEC, not only were the LLCs sustaining major losses, but also the Jacobsons were using investor money to pay for their personal and business expenses. They were also using new investors’ money to and pay earlier investors. The Jacobsons used the Ponzi scam to cause investors, who were getting “returns,” to think that the LLCs were making a profit.

Beginning last year, investors were told that properties were sold and they had made a profit when no sales actually occurred. Instead, the “sales” were used to move investors from and into specific properties.

The SEC is seeking disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, financial penalties, and prejudgment interest.

SEC Halts Father-Son Ponzi Scheme in Utah Involving Purported Real Estate Investments, SEC, December 15, 2011
Mormons fleeced in $220M investment scam: SEC, Investment News, December 16, 2011

More Blog Posts:
Colorado Securities Fraud: Universal Consulting Resources LLC and Owner Richard Dalton to Pay $15.8M to Settle SEC Lawsuit Over Ponzi Scam, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, December 9, 2011
Former Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC Employee Faces SEC Charges for Creating Fake Trades to Enable Ponzi Scam, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, November 23, 2011
SEC Issues Emergency Order to Stop $26M “Green” Ponzi Scam, Institutional Investor Securities Fraud, October 13, 2011 Continue Reading ›

Texas Securities Fraud Over Sale of Allegedly Bogus Annuities to Elderly Seniors

Published on: December 14, 2011 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Two men are accused of Texas securities fraud involving the sale of bogus annuities to the elderly. The authorities arrested Leon Randy Sinclair III, a 53-year-old Houston man, on charges of theft by deception, misapplication of fiduciary property, and money laundering. Sinclair and his San Antonio-based business partner, Luther Pierce Hendon, allegedly transferred money from the investment policies into their own bank accounts.

Dozens of elderly persons were reportedly bilked out of their life savings while the two men allegedly stole millions of dollars. The elderly clients were sold charitable gift annuities that they thought would go toward their savings for the future. Unfortunately, per the criminal complaints filed against Hendon and Sinclair, the money they were investing actually went to the two men.

Annuities

Bankruptcy Judge Grants MF Global Permission to Use $21M from JPMorgan Chase

Published on: December 14, 2011 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn says that MF Global Holdings Inc. can use approximately $21 million in cash collateral from JPMorgan Chase & Co, which is its mortgage lender. In issuing this decision, Glenn overruled customer objections that this money could be part of the $1.2B that has gone missing from their accounts. MF Global and JP Morgan have arrived at an agreement over how the cash will be used.

At the start of MF Global’s bankruptcy, JPMorgan had already consented to let the brokerage firm use $26M. This was per an agreement that would give the investment bank a lien on all MF Global assets.

It was just earlier this month that Glenn ruled that MF Global Inc. clients could recover 72% of what they lost when the broker-dealer filed for bankruptcy. Ruling against objections made by the brokerage firm’s creditors, he approved trustee James Giddens’ request. Per Glenn’s decision, MF Global’s clients can receive another $2.2 billion distribution, which lets them get back .72 on the dollar.

While the majority of the transfers were to go out within a few days, some were expected to take up to four weeks. In a separate decision, the Glenn approved transferring approximately 330 MF Global client securities accounts to Perrin, Holden & Davenport Capital Corp. MF Global has already moved approximately 38,000 commodities accounts to other financial firms.

Glen plans to tackle the issue of physical goods distribution, such as silver and gold bars, next month. Clients have complained about not being able to get their share of ownership of such items, which cannot be physically divided. HSBC Holdings Plc (HSBA) has even filed a lawsuit against Giddens. The financial firm is trying to determine whois the owner of the 15 silver bars and five gold bars underlying several Comex contracts between a client and MF Global.

Previous payouts to commodity clients are already at about $2 billion. However, some customers have said they didn’t receive any money from these initial payments.

In other MF Global-related news, CME Group has stopped issuing grants through its primary foundation in the wake of the brokerage firm’s bankruptcy filing. The Chicago-based commodities exchange had issued $22 million to Chicago-area schools and charities in the last five years. CME has said that it will continue to support charitable organizations through other corporate foundations and programs.

In November, CME said it would give ex- MF Global customers the $50 million that was held by CME Trust. Originally meant to assist traders, the trust had turned into a primary source of charitable giving for the exchange operator.

Exclusive: CME Trust’s charity grants halt on MF failure, Reuters, December 18, 2011

MF Global Wins Permission to Use JPMorgan’s Cash as Judge Suggests Probe, Bloomberg, December 14, 2011

MF Global clients get back 72 cents on the dollar, Bloomberg/Investment News, December 9, 2011

More Blog Posts:
$1.2 Billion of MF Global Inc.’s Clients Money Still Missing, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, December 10, 2011

MF Global Shortfall May Be More than $1.2B, Says Trustee, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, November 26, 2011

MF Global Holdings Ltd. Files for Bankruptcy While Its Broker Faces Liquidation and Securities Lawsuit by SIPC, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, October 31, 2011