Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP Home
We Fight for Investors Cheated by Wall Street
Contact Us Now 
Investor Lawyers Blog
Search Results: failure to supervise
Results 50-60 of about 137
Date: December 7, 2016
Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Galvin has filed charges against LPL Financial (LPLA) for its alleged failure to supervise one of its brokers. Roger Zullo is accused of bilking clients for years by selling variable annuities to retirees ...
Date: December 1, 2016
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) has fined Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc (“Merrill Lynch”) $6.25 million and imposed a restitution penalty of $780,000 over Merrill Lynch’s inadequate supervision of its customers that employed leverage in brokerage accounts, ...
Date: November 21, 2016
The failure to apply the appropriate fee waiver discount for mutual fund shares purportedly occurred between 2009 and 2015. Already, Oppenheimer has paid over $6M to settle customer disputes alleging inadequate supervision of Hotton and another $1.25M to 22 customers ...
Date: October 10, 2016
Texas-Based Brokerage Firm Accused of Inadequate Supervision Involving VA Exchanges The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority is ordering IMS Securities Inc. to pay a $100K fine. The Texas-based brokerage firm is accused of failures related to its monitoring of variable annuity ...
Date: August 29, 2016
FINRA contends that supervisory failures is what allowed Caldwell International Securities’ brokers to allegedly engage in churning. This involves a trader taking part in excessive trading to make the most in commissions possible.
Date: August 19, 2016
According to the regulator, for five days the firm, which is a provisionally registered Swap Dealer, did not report any swap data for a number of asset classes, turned in untimely and unfinished swap information, failed to supervise the staff ...
Date: June 29, 2016
Ex-LPL Financial Supervisor Settles with FINRA Peter Neuberg, a former LPL Financial (LPLA) supervisor and broker, will pay a $15K fine and serve a six-month suspension to settle claims accusing him of not reasonably supervising a registered representative.
Date: March 8, 2016
The married couple, who are retirees in their sixties, are accusing the brokerage firm of: · Common law fraud · Negligence · Breach of fiduciary duty · Negligent supervision · Failure to adequately disclose the risks In a phone interview ...
Date: February 24, 2016
Silipingo, in his claim, asserted a number of causes of action, including common law fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, beach of contract, suitability, churning, failure to supervise, and violations of Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act violation and The ...
Date: January 30, 2016
She accused the firm of making unsuitable recommendations and engaging in negligent supervision and disclose failures. Bloomberg reports this is one of the first cases involving an investor in the U.S mainland seeking financial recovery related to the Commonwealth’s debt.
