Merrill Lynch

SEC Reaches Preliminary Settlement with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith to Liquidate About $8.5 Billion in Auction Rate Securities

Published on: September 1, 2008 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The Securities and Exchange Commission says it has reached a preliminary settlement agreement with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith to liquidate about $8.5 billion in auction-rate securities that are still held by the firm’s institutional and retail investors. Small businesses, individual investors, and charities have until January 15, 2010 to accept Merrill’s offer to repurchase at par value some $7.5 billion in ARS. The investment bank will provide liquidity to some $1.5 billion in ARS that were purchased by institutional investors.

Merrill has “agreed in principal” to the terms of the agreement and is not agreeing to or denying the SEC allegations by settling. The SEC has accused Merrill of misleading thousands of clients into thinking that ARS were highly liquid and equivalent to cash or money market instruments even when the investment bank knew that the market was in trouble.

This settlement does not exempt Merrill from being named in civil lawsuits filed by investors seeking restitution for their losses. As part of its agreement with the SEC, Merrill says it will not deny liability for liquidity loss. The SEC is also evaluating whether an additional fine needs to be imposed on Merrill.

Merrill, along with Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Deutsch Bank AG, also reached an auction-rate securities market settlement with New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo. As part of its agreement with the NY AG, Merrill will buy back from retail clients, with account balances up to $4 million, up to $12 billion of illiquid ARS at par. It will also pay a $125 million penalty fee.

Related Web Resources:

SEC Enforcement Division Announces Preliminary Settlement With Merrill Lynch to Help Auction Rate Securities Investors, SEC, August 22, 2008
Continue Reading ›

Massachusetts Slaps Merrill Lynch with Auction-Rate Securities Fraud-Related Charges

Published on: August 4, 2008 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth has filed securities fraud-related charges against Merrill Lynch for allegedly promoting the sale of auction rate securities while providing misleading information about market stability.

According to Secretary William Galvin, Merrill Lynch aggressively sold ARS to investors while telling research analysts to downplay market risks in its reports until the moment the company had to pull” the plug on its auctions.” The majority of auctions failed a day later. Galvin says that Merrill Lynch’s investors had no idea that potential trouble was brewing with their investments until it was too late for them to take action.

Galvin is also accusing Merrill Lynch of pressuring its research analysts, who are supposed to be neutral, into redacting or rewriting any reports that did not profile ARS positively. His complaint alleges that Merrill Lynch made approximately $90 million from the auction-rate securities market between 2006 and 2007. He wants Merrill Lynch to “make good” on the sales of the securities by making restitution to investors that sold their securities at below par.

Merrill Lynch issued a statement expressing disappointment that Massachusetts had filed its complaint. The company maintains that its advisers sold ARS because they thought that the securities would provide a higher return to investors.

Last week, Merrill Lynch said it would sell over $30 billion in toxic mortgage-related assets at a huge loss to help alleviate its own debt issues. A question to consider is whether Merrill Lynch, a large investment firm known for its powerhouse brand, can recoup its once solid reputation.

Related Web Resources:

Secretary Galvin Charges Merrill Lynch with Fraud in Auction Rate Securities Dealings (The Complaint)

Massachusetts sues Merrill Lynch over auction securities, USA Today, August 1, 2008
Merrill Lynch
Continue Reading ›

Securities Fraud Lawsuit Against Ex-Merrill Lynch Analyst Accused of Issuing False Reports About CMGI Inc. is Dismissed

Published on: May 20, 2008 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

In New York, a judge has dismissed the securities fraud case against former Merrill Lynch research analyst Henry Blodget. The former lead Internet analyst of the company’s Internet Group is accused of allegedly issuing false reports regarding CMGI Inc. stock.

In 2007, investor Ronald Ventura had filed a securities fraud lawsuit against Merrill Lynch & Co., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., and Blodget. Ventura is one of a number of plaintiffs that have sued the defendants after the New York State Attorney General’s Office made allegations that they had published misleading or false recommendations about Internet-based stocks. Merrill Lynch agreed to a $100 million fine in 2002 as part of a settlement deal with the NYAG.

In The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York earlier this month, Judge John Keenan said that Ronald Ventura’s complaint “fails to plead that the alleged false statements made by the defendants were the cause of Ventura’s financial losses.”

Merrill Lynch Sues Insurer for Failing to Honor Claims Opening Door to Mysterious “Swaps” Market

Published on: April 1, 2008 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Merrill Lynch & Co. has publicly opened the door to what many believe could be an even larger problem to the credit markets than the widely publicized sub-prime mortgage debacle – the little understood and sledom discussed “swaps” market.

Perhaps the world’s most high-profile financial firm, Merrill – itself a frequent complainer about lawsuits – has filed a monster of a suit in a New York court against bond insurer Security Capital Assurance Ltd. (SCA). Merrill Lynch sued the insurer alleging it failed to honor seven contracts promising to cover losses on $3.1 billion in “credit swaps,” after which SCA filed a countersuit against Merrill for $28 million. .

Merrill claims SCA walked away from signed insurance contracts guaranteeing Merrill against losses. SCA counterclaims that Merrill broke a stipulation in one of the contracts which entitles SCA to terminate all the agreements and collect damages. (Perhaps Merrill is getting a taste of what many us have experienced: an insurance company happy to collect premiums but which later relies on a technicality to avoid payment.)

UBS Securities, Bank of America, and Merrill Lynch Among Firms Subpoenaed In Massachusetts Auction-Rate Market Sales Probe

Published on: April 1, 2008 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin is subpoenaing Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith Inc., UBS Securities, and Bank of America Investments because it wants information about the companies’ involvement in selling auction-rate market securities to retail investors. The companies are all registered Massachusetts broker dealers. Galvin issued the subpoenas on behalf of the Massachusetts Securities Division.

The division wants to determine whether the firms followed proper procedures in letting Massachusetts investors know of the possibilities that their investments could become illiquid. The state is also trying to determine what role big investment banks played in causing the auctions to fail and whether the investments sold to retail investors were suitable.

Many of the investors that bought auction market securities cannot get their money because the securities are frozen. Small business owners and individual investors have been especially hurt by the failures in the auction market because of the subprime mortgage collapse.

Wachovia Securities Analyst Comments on Bear Stearns’ Sale and Calls Merrill Lynch the “Riskiest” Investment Bank

Published on: March 19, 2008 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

In a note to investors, Wachovia Securities Analyst Doug Sipkin commented on the state of the leading Wall Street securities firms in light of the worsening global credit crisis.

Sipkin blamed the “The failure of Bear Stearns” on a “management issue” rather than a “market issue.” JP Morgan Chase & Co. recently purchased Bear Stearns, the fifth largest securities company, for $236 million-that’s $2/share-a 90% market drop in just two days. The securities firm ran out of money after clients took away funds.

Sipkin, however, reassured investors that the action taken by the Federal Reserve to reduce emergency lending rates will keep the other four big securities firms in business.

Merrill Lynch, Prudential Securities, Pruco and UBS Must pay $2.4 Million in Fines for Mutual Fund Abuses

Published on: February 28, 2008 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) announced today that five major brokerage firms have agreed to pay fines totaling $2.4 million for supervision violations and improper mutual fund sales to thousands of investors. These firms must take remedial steps to prevent such actions in the future and pay amounts estimated to exceed $25 million to their clients because of such practices.

According to FINRA, the violations include sales by these firms of load securities, meaning clients were required to pay commissions, when these investors were eligible to make fund exchanges without paying commissions. FINRA’s press release states that “Class B and Class C mutual fund shares and failure to have supervisory systems designed to provide all eligible investors with the opportunity to purchase Class A mutual fund shares at net asset value (NAV) through NAV transfer programs.”

Prudential Securities must pay an $800,000 fine, UBS Financial Services, Inc. was fined $750,000 and Pruco Securities was hit for $100,000 for improper sales of Class B and Class C mutual fund shares. These firms also agreed to remediation plans that will address over 27,000 fund transactions in the accounts of 5,300 households. Merrill Lynch, Prudential Securities, UBS and Wells Fargo must take steps regarding customers who qualified for but did not receive the benefit of NAV transfer programs. It is estimated that total remediation to fhese firms’ customers will exceed $25 million.

Deutsche Bank Trust Company, Goldman Sachs Group, and Bank of America Corporation are Among the 21 Lenders Named in Cleveland, Ohio Lawsuit

Published on: January 24, 2008 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The city of Cleveland, Ohio is suing 21 financial institutions for hundreds of millions of dollars in damages caused by subprime lending and securitization. The defendants named in the lawsuit are:

• Deutsche Bank Trust Company • Ameriquest Mortgage Company • Bank of America Corporation • The Bear Stearns Companies • Citigroup, Inc.

• Countrywide Financial Corp.

Bear Stearns, Deutsche Bank, and Merrill Lynch Among the Wall Street Firms Subpoenaed by New York Prosecutors

Published on: December 12, 2007 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is subpoenaing several Wall Street firms, including Deutsche Bank AG, Merrill Lynch & Co, and Bear Stearns, for information about packaging and selling debt connect to high-risk mortgages.

Prosecutors want to look at the way investment banks review the quality of mortgages before turning them into packaged products that can be sold to investors. They also want to find out how debt is being turned into securities and learn more about the credit-rating firm-bank relationship.

This past summer, mortgage-backed securities affected by growing default and delinquency rates had high debt ratings despite the backing of loans issued to lenders.

Merrill Liable for $6 Million to Estate of Elderly Couple

Published on: October 22, 2007 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

A Florida jury has ordered Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. to pay $6 million to the daughters of a New Jersey philanthropist and his wife. The claims against Merrill Lynch included that its broker took advantage of the elderly couple’s deteriorating mental condition in order to convert their money into investments that paid he and the firm higher commissions.

The suit also claimed the Merrill broker falsely told Mr. Rothman in three letters that the investments carried no fees or sales commissions. An attorney for the heirs said that Merill and its brokers made at least $2.5 million in fees on the Rothmans’ $32 million investment in variable annuities, while the investors only made $600,000.

“The verdict is astonishing in light of the undisputed fact that the Rothmans, who were wealthy, sophisticated investors, made $10 million on the annuities at issue, and did not lose money,” a Merrill spokesman said. “The verdict is unjustified by the facts and law.”