Investor Lawyers Blog

While Former Merrill Lynch & Co. Stockbroker is Found Guilty of Witness Tampering, Seven Other Defendants are Acquitted in “Squawk Box” Securities Fraud Case Involving A.B. Watley Employees

Published on: July 7, 2007 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, a jury issued its verdict in the “squawk box” front running case. Seven people were acquitted of securities fraud, while Timothy O’Connell, a former Merrill Lynch & Co. stockbroker was found guilty of making false statements and of witness tampering. The judge, however, declared a mistrial for the one remaining conspiracy count to commit securities fraud against O’Connell. He faces up to 15 years in prison for the convictions, and prosecutors have announced that they will retry the conspiracy charge.

According to prosecutors, O’Connell, and the two other broker defendants, David Ghysels-a former Lehman Brothers broker-and Kenneth Mahaffy-a former Merrill Lynch & Co. brokers, purposely placed off-the-hook phones that were active next to internal speaker systems at their firms.

The purpose of doing this was to let a number of former A.B. Watley employees, including ex-president Robert Malin, former proprietary trading supervisor Keevan Leonard, former compliance director Linus Nwaigwe, and former CEO Michael Picone, listen in while large orders about to be made by institutional clients were broadcast over the boxes.

Want to Make Big Bucks Without Responsibility? Become a Corporate Director

Published on: July 5, 2007 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

A Texas judge dismissed a shareholder class action against the directors of energy firm TXU, holding that, under Texas law, shareholders of a company can not sue that company’s directors. Thus, shareholders can only sue the company itself, which is really suing themselves. Meanwhile, the company can sue the board members but, since the board members would decide that, what is the likelihood? (An arcane action known as a shareholders derivative suit can be filed by the shareholders, if they can demonstrate the board should have initiated the action – against themselves – but did not.)

The lawsuit filed by the TXU shareholders claimed the directors violated their fiduciary duty in agreeing to acquisition of TXU by a private equity firm for $45 billion paid to the shareholders. Were the shareholders cheated? We will never know, will we, because the suit was dismissed, meaning that these and other shareholders can’t sue a company’s directors – at least not in Texas.

If you learn of job openings for Corporate Directors, apply fast – and give me a call!

Follow Up: North Carolina Treasurer Urges Elimination of Brokerage Firms Voting of Client Shares

Published on: July 5, 2007 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

On June 11, 2007, we published an article entitled “Should Brokerage Firms Continue to Vote Their Clients’ Shares without Permission, Including for Corporate Directors?” State Treasurer Richard Moore of North Carolina has recently answered that question with a resounding “No!”

In a statement, Moore contends that allowing such votes thwarts corporate reform and prevents shareholders of a company from having adequate representation in director elections. Moore is also a board member of NYSE Regulation and called on SEC to approve an NYSE proposal that would change its Rule 452 to eliminate broker voting in all director elections.

Under the NYSE’s current rule, brokers may vote on “routine” proposals if the beneficial owner of the stock has not provided specific voting instructions to the broker at least 10 days before a scheduled meeting. The proposed change would end all voting of customer shares for directors by categorizing all such elections as “non-routine.”

SEC Declines to Exempt From Broker Dealer Registration A Consulting Firm Which Raises Capital For Small Businesses

Published on: July 4, 2007 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Hallmark Capital Corporation sought a “No Action” letter from the SEC’s Division of Market Regulation seeking it be given an exemption from registration as a broker-dealer (securities firm).

Hallmark states that it serves small businesses as a financial consultant, to assist such business with capital raising and other matters. It informs clients and potential clients it is not a broker-dealer, does not act as an agent for the client company and does not effect transactions for the account of others. The company also does not offer to sell securities to or solicit investment funds from the general investing public.

More specifically, its CEO stated that Hallmark assists small businesses with revenues under $25 million with their debt and equity capital needs, including preparing confidential information summaries describing the business, identifying broker-dealer firms that might work with these companies and arranging meetings for engaging broker-dealers to raise capital. It then has control over significant aspects of any securities transactions.

SEC Alleges that a Hedge Fund, Its Owner and Its Chief Trader Illegally Earned $57 Million in a Late-Trading Scam.

Published on: July 4, 2007 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The Securities and Exchange Commission filed suit in a New York Federal Court contending that Simpson Capital Management Inc., its owner and its head trader entered into late-trades in hundreds of mutual funds, defrauding the funds and their shareholders of approximately $57 million.

The SEC claims that the defendants placed more than 10,000 unlawful mutual fund trade orders after the market closed, enabling them to take advantage of knowledge of after-market events while receiving the price previously established that day as the fund’s closing net asset value. Simpson Capital is the investment adviser to two hedge funds, Simpson Partners L.P. and Simpson Offshore Ltd.

The SEC further charged that the firm’s owner, who was also an investor in the Simpson Funds, “personally earned at least $19 million in fees and profits” as a result of the fraudulent transactions, adding that the head trader “received more than $996,000 in salary and bonuses during the late trading scheme.” The SEC is asking the court to order permanent injunctions, disgorgement plus prejudgment interest, and civil penalties.

U.S. Treasury Official Brags of Close Ties to Wall Street in Advancing Support of the “Race to the Bottom” in Compliance Laws

Published on: July 3, 2007 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The U.S. Treasury Secretary announced the second stage of its “capital markets competitiveness plan” devoted to efforts to “modernize the structure” of the regulatory system for all U.S. financial services providers. The announcement was made before the New York Stock Exchange’s conference on deals and deal-making, hosted by the Wall Street Journal.

As the securities industry is rapidly being globalized, Wall Street insists it can not compete with loose regulations elsewhere in the world unless U.S. standards for reporting, fraud and other wrongdoing are relaxed. Frenzied cries to federal and state officials hype this theme as if the “sky is falling.” Meanwhile, Republicans and Democrats, including candidates for both state and federal office, are taking the bait. Or, perhaps, these candidates know that many of the largest campaign donors around are found on Wall Street.

The fear mongering about losing the battle for listing shares has even invaded the courts as observers, including the SEC, lobby even the U.S. Supreme Court, stating that our nation is on the brink of disaster since it can not compete with foreign markets with almost no oversight.

Wells Fargo and its Former Research Director Fined Over Undisclosed Conflict

Published on: July 3, 2007 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

NASD levied a fine of $250,000 against Wells Fargo Securities LLC and $40,000 against its former research director, plus other sanctions, for failing to disclose that the lead analyst on reports issued on a company had accepted a position with that company.

The research reports concerned Cadence Design Systems, which designs semi-conductors for use in the global electronics market. According to the NASD, the analyst had applied for a job with that company prior to issuance of a report in 2005, and had two job interviews prior to issuance of others, none of which was disclosed in the reports.

The NASD’s sanctioning order states that the analyst was then offered a position at Cadence to earn over $300,000, plus Cadence stock and options, which she disclosed to the Wells Fargo and its head of research. Yet, weeks later Wells Fargo published a third research report favorable to Cadence, without disclosure of the hiring.

MML Investors Services, NYLIFE Securities, Securities America and Northwestern Mutual Investment Services Fined a Total of $1.2 Million for Mutual Fund Violations

Published on: July 2, 2007 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The NASD fined four firms for mutual fund sales violations and for failures to properly supervise such sales. The fine amounts are $473,000 against MML Investors Services, Inc., $354,000 against NYLIFE Securities LLC, $322,000 against Securities America, Inc. and $100,000 against Northwestern Mutual Investment Services.

The violations charged include sales of Class B and Class B shares, causing investors not to receive the benefits of price breaks on Class A shares, failures to properly notify clients of available cost free transfers from one mutual fund to another at the funds’ net asset values and failure to have adequate supervisory systems and procedures to prevent such violations.

In resolving the case, MML and Northwestern must also pay their clients who qualified for, but did not receive, the net asset transfer benefits and pay refunds to those who did not benefit from the price breaks. Including the refunds already paid, it is estimated that thousands of clients of these two firms will receive a total of more than $6.5 million.

H&R Block Earnings are Sunk by Subprime Mortgage Unit

Published on: June 30, 2007 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

H&R Block reported a loss of $433.7 million for its fiscal year 2007, compared to a gain of $490.4 million a year ago, and it lost $85.6 million in the fourth quarter vs. a gain of $587.5 in the year earlier period. The losses can mostly be attributed to Option One, its subprime mortgage unit, which the company hopes to soon sell.

The nation’s largest tax preparer was started in Kansas City by Henry and Roger “Bloch” brothers when the IRS stopped preparing tax returns free in 1955. The firm has been hugely successful in that business – for a few months out of the year. Yet the firm has been mostly unsuccessful in other ventures seeking to earn revenues the rest of the year.

Its investment subsidiary, H&R Block Financial Advisors, arose from the Block’s purchase of Olde Financial Company in 1998 for $850 million. At the time Olde and its founder were in the midst of many regulatory and other woes, many of which Block inherited.

Securities Industry Regulatory Authority (SIRA) Will Replace NASD as Name of Combined SRO (But Why?)

Published on: June 29, 2007 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The newly formed self-regulatory organization for broker-dealers will be called The Securities Industry Regulatory Authority (SIRA). This “new” organization is actually the same NASD, plus the regulatory functions of the NYSE, which it paid-off NASD members to assume. So a question to the NASD is: Why change your name?)

SIRA is scheduled to launch in the next few months. NASD’s Director Linda Shapiro, slated to head SIRA, said the organization will include more “principles-based and prudential regulation” as part of its focus. She said that NYSE Regulation and NASD will combine their rulebooks.

Shapiro said that the organization will use “proactive” regulation to help firms stay in compliance instead of waiting for them to violate regulations before enforcing the rules. “Proactive regulation” is currently used for overseeing a small group of large firms in the Consolidated Supervised Entity (CSE) Program. SIRA will take the CSE model and push it into the industry more. Use of “proactive” regulation will allow firms to understand SIRA’s expectations, which will hopefully protect investors.