COVID-19 UPDATE: We're Open and Ready to Serve Our ClientsLearn More Here

Articles Tagged with collateralized debt obligations

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed civil charges against Talimco LLC, a registered investment adviser (RIA), and its former COO Grant Gardner Rogers. The regulator is accusing them both of rigging a commercial real estate auction it held for  one client to benefit another client, defrauding the selling client as a result. Talimco and Rogers are consenting to the cease-and-desist orders against them but without denying or admitting to the findings.

The SEC contends that around April 2015, the RIA and Rogers sought to help the selling client—a collateralized debt obligation (CDO)— sell a commercial real estate asset, while intending to help a different client—a private fund that Talimco had created—to acquire the asset. The regulator claims that instead of looking for a number of bidders for the asset that was for sale—it was the firm and Roger’s fiduciary duty to help the CDO client find a number of willing bidders so as to obtain the best price possible—Rogers purportedly only presented the selling client with the affiliated private fund client’s bid and the bids of two other “unwilling” parties. The latter two were assured that their bids would not win.

Because of this alleged “manipulation,” the private fund client’s bid ended up being the highest, and the fund was able to acquire the commercial real estate asset for half of its value at about $28.6M. The fund, with the help of further alleged manipulation by Talimco and Rogers, later sold the asset at a profit for $43.5M.

Moody’s Corp. (MCO) will pay nearly $864M to settle allegations about the way that credit ratings agency rated high-risk mortgage securities, including residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBSs) and collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), leading up to the 2008 financial crisis. The settlement was reached between Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Analytics Inc., and Moodys’ Investors Services, and the US Department of Justice, the District of Columbia, and 21 US states. Moody’s is accused of knowing that it was inflating the ratings of mortgage securities that were toxic.

As part of the agreement, $437M will be paid as penalty to the DOJ. The rest of the $426.3M would be divided between DC and the states. Moody’s consented to measures that would make sure of its credit ratings’ integrity moving forward, and its chief executive will have to certify measures of compliance for a minimum of five years.

Despite settling, Moody’s maintains that its ratings pre-the 2008 crisis were valid. The credit rater also pointed out that this case has been resolved without any findings that it violated any laws. Moody’s is not admitting any liability. However, in a Statement of Facts, the company admitted to key parts of its purported behavior.

Continue Reading ›

Contact Information