LJM Preservation and Growth Fund Tag Archives

Triad Advisors To Pay $195K Fine and More Than $510K in Restitution For LJM Fund Sales

Published on: January 12, 2022 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

FINRA Said Triad Brokers Unsuitably Recommended LJM Preservation and Growth Fund

In December 2021, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) censured and fined Triad Advisors $195K for allegedly failing to supervise its registered representatives that unsuitably recommended the LJM Preservation and Growth Fund (LJM) to customers.

The self-regulatory organization (SRO) contends that the broker-dealer allowed the sales to go through without first conducting the proper due diligence into the LJM Fund – especially while not having enough understanding about the Fund’s features and the risks involved.

Cambridge Investment Services, Securities America, and JW Cole Financial Fined Over LJM Preservation & Growth Fund Recommendations

Published on: April 6, 2021 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Broker-Dealers Collectively Will Pay $550K Fine and Over $3.3M in Restitution

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has fined and censured three brokerage firms after finding that they failed to supervise recommendations of the LJM Preservation and Growth Fund (LJMIX, LJMCX, LJMAX) and did not conduct the proper due diligence into the alternative mutual fund:

Cambridge Investment Services will pay a $400K fine plus more than $3M in restitution

Summit Investment to Pay Investor $100K for LJM Preservation and Growth Fund

Published on: November 22, 2019 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Summit Investment Management To Pay Investor $100K

A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) panel said that Summit Investment Management and portfolio manager, Thomas Carroll, must pay one firm client $100K for investing his money in funds from the investment manager, LJM Partners, which is no longer in operation.

The LJM Preservation and Growth Fund (LJMIX) has been named in numerous complaints since early last year when it suffered a huge plunge in value of over 80% in two days. This happened after the CBO Volatility Index experienced a spike.

As LJM Preservation and Growth Fund Declines in Value and Announces Shut Down, Investors Suffer Losses

Published on: March 1, 2018 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The LJM Preservation and Growth Fund (LJMIX, LJMAX, LJMCX) is facing allegations that it made false and misleading statements to investors. In particular, the fund represented that it was appropriate for capital preservation investors who wanted conservative growth of their account. In reality, the mutual fund exposed investors to high risks that made them vulnerable to massive losses when it lost nearly all of its value within two days, dropping more than 80% earlier this month. In a filing with securities regulators, The LJM Partners, LTD., which is based in Chicago, announced that it was shuttering operations by March 29 and is going into liquidation.

The latest earnings report for the fund, filed at the end of October, noted $768 million of net assets. Reuters reports that the fund’s net assets were $812 million at the start of month but that is now reduced to $14 million. After this massive drop, the fund announced that it would no longer be open to new investments. Soon after, investors brought a class action securities lawsuit against the mutual fund. The plaintiffs are alleging that the LJM Preservation and Growth Fund violated the Securities Act and misled them by claiming it was committed to “preserve capital, particularly in down market.”

LJM, operated by Anthony Caine and Anish Parvatanen, was among a number of companies involved in selling liquid alternative funds that were complex and came with high fees. Investors that sought these funds out were generally hoping to enhance their returns even while reducing the risks. However, the fund did not accomplish that goal. It instead embarked on a risky strategy involving complex options trading and other investments that are not appropriate for any investor seeking capital preservation.